Saint John Hospital Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
480543768
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2012
Forms available
Form 990 2012
Location
Kansas City, KS, USA
Phone
9136806000
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Hospital, General

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$36,325,537
Expenses
$42,674,437
Assets
$10,316,954
Liabilities
$4,854,644

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

27 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We will, in the spirit of the sisters of charity, reveal god's healing love by improving the health of the individuals and communities we serve, especially those who are poor or vulnerable.

What it reported doing in 2012

It is the philosophy of the sisters of charity of leavenworth health system, inc. And affiliated hospitals to treat patients in a non-discriminatory manner, minimize human suffering as much as possible; create a preferential option for the poor; and provide assistance to those patients who have limited financial resources. The hospital participates in the medicare and medicaid programs and as such provide care at reimbursement levels lower than charges. The difference between reimbursement from these programs and charges at established rates are included in the hospital's mission in service to the community which it operates. To that end, the hospital has instituted and participates in the following community benefit activities; provides laboratory, radiological, and pharmaceutical service at duchesne clinic. Duchesne clinic is a clinic for the care of the medically indigent. Community health services are provided at minimal or no charge: cholesteral screening, blood sugar screening, sibling preparation, lamaze childbirth classes, cancer support, group stroke support group, breast feeding support, hearing screening, cesarean birth classes, freedom from smoking, colorectal screening, nutritional counseling; hospital care: inpatient days of care, inpatient admissions, newborn deliveries, outpatient registrations, emergency room visits, clinic visits.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 68
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 13
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -17.5%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.24; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.47; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.5%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -29.3% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 12 of 16 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $31.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $523K · 27 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed
  • Consistency: 29 of 30 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2010 to 2012
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 37 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D land buildings reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 32/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.