Lutheran Medical Center Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 208846152
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2020
- Location
- Wheat Ridge, CO, USA
- Phone
- 8018427851
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,223,834
- Expenses
- $3,020,703
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KATHERINE REPOLA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- ANDREA BURCH (TRUSTEE): $789,177 total reported compensation
- KRISTI DAVIS (TRUSTEE): $327,195 total reported compensation
- DAVID SCOTT MINER MD (TRUSTEE (PARTIAL)): $300,869 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Be a model health system by providing extraordinary care and superior service at an affordable cost.
What it reported doing in 2025
The lutheran medical center foundation (lmcf) is a 501(c)3 not for profit organization that creates impact to support excellent patient care and innovative new ideas in medicine at lutheran medical center (lmc). Through the generosity of corporations, foundations, individuals and other donors, our mission to improve the health of the people and communities we serve in a changing world is achieved. Lmcf provides for the changing healthcare needs of our community by assisting with the building of state-of-art facilities, developing innovative care models and making sure that all patients have access to world-class care and the best patient experience. Lmcf turns good healthcare into exceptional healthcare by enabling lmc's staff to exceed the expectations of the people we serve. Lmcf was established in 2007 and has positively impacted lmc and all its affiliated services including lutheran hospice at collier hospice center. Lmcf disbursed funds to lmc to purchase critical care equipment, provide staff with educational and leadership opportunities, provide compassionate end-of-life care, support behavioral health needs, aid in the building of a new hospital and enhance the hospital's overall best care of patients.on april 1, 2022, intermountain health care, inc. And sisters of charity of leavenworth health system, inc. Affiliated, creating a model health system that provides high-quality, accessible, and affordable healthcare to communities in Utah, Idaho, Nevada, Colorado, Montana, Wyoming, and Kansas. The organization employs more than 69,000 caregivers, operates 34 hospitals (including one virtual hospital), and runs hundreds of clinics, while providing health insurance to more than one million people in Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, and Utah.in order to operate more efficiently, the decision was made to consolidate the various foundations operated as part of sisters of charity of leavenworth health system. This return is marked final; however, lmcf will continue to operate as a dba under intermountain healthcare foundation, inc. (fein 80-0225150).major initiatives in 2025 included: - the legacy continues comprehensive campaign has raised more than 100% of its goal of $12m. The campaign supports all departments at lutheran with emphasis on the new, replacement lmc new build. - supported palliative care and hospice programs including integrative therapies for patients, education for caregivers and grief support for families. - supporting the nurse recovery assistance program to help pregnant mothers struggling with substance abuse and their babies, with a special focus on opioid addiction. - offered humanitarian funds for our most vulnerable patients providing prescriptions, food, transportation and other basic needs. - gave special education opportunities to our physicians, clinicians and associates to support specialized care and patient safety. - purchased new, state-of-the-art equipment for lutheran hospice and other hospital departments. - supported lmc's oncology programs including testing counseling, patient navigation and comfort therapies for oncology patients.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 99% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 76
- Accountability: 81
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 65%; rating input score 65
- Program expense ratio: 83.5%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $16.95 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.8%; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 28.5%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.9%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 65% of revenue deployed · 83.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 14 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $789K · 16 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 84 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.