Intermountain Health
Legal name: Scl Health - Montana
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 810232124
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Salt Lake City, UT, US
- Phone
- (801) 442-2000
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $618,942,898
- Expenses
- $620,528,525
- Assets
- $1,000,928,013
- Liabilities
- $48,170,563
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
45 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRYAN JOHNSON (INTERIM PRESIDENT, MT REGION (PARTIAL))
- LEE BOYLES (MT MKT PRESIDENT/SVB PRESIDENT (PARTIAL))
- TYLER WILTGEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF PHILANTHROPY SVB)
- CAROL BEAM (PRESIDENT CEO RMHN SVB)
Highest reported compensation
- YEVGENIY AREFIEV (FORMER HIGHEST COMPENSATED): $1,414,869 total reported compensation
- BRYAN JOHNSON (INTERIM PRESIDENT, MT REGION (PARTIAL)): $1,085,130 total reported compensation
- LEE BOYLES (MT MKT PRESIDENT/SVB PRESIDENT (PARTIAL)): $720,394 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Helping people live the healthiest lives possible®
What it reported doing in 2024
Mother xavier ross led the sisters of charity into the indian territory of Kansas in 1858. In 1869, the sisters extended their charitable works into Montana territory at the request of father pierre jean desmet. Saint vincent hospital in billings was founded by the sisters of charity of leavenworth in 1898. The hospital officially opened on february 1, 1899. The city and region grew quickly and the demand for healthcare increased dramatically. By 1915, the sisters and area medical personnel had cared for more than 20,000 patients.during the next thirty years, rapid medical advancements and the area's growing population kept the hospital in a constant state of change and growth, but true to its mission, compassion and charity remained at the forefront of the hospital's endeavors. During the great depression of the 1930s, the sisters at saint vincent hospital helped feed the hungry. With the advent of world war ii, volunteer services became essential to the operation of the hospital.adapting to the changes in healthcare meant a new name for saint vincent hospital. In november 2000, we became st. Vincent healthcare. From its modest beginnings over 100 years ago, st. Vincent healthcare has grown into one of Montana's largest comprehensive hospitals, serving the healthcare needs of over 400,000 people in a four-state area. Renowned for a mission of compassionate care and service to the poor, the st. Vincent healthcare team is continually recognized as a technological leader in the healthcare industry. The name was again changed in 2021 to scl health - Montana. Scl health - Montana is part of sisters of charity of leavenworth health system.scl health - Montana is related to scl health medical group -billings, llc, a single member limited liability company owned by a related organization, sisters of charity of leavenworth health system, inc. Scl health medical group - billings, llc is a group of physician clinics that provide professional services to the scl health - Montana community and supports the mission of scl health - Montana.although scl health medical group - billings, llc is not owned directly by scl health - Montana, scl health - Montana is required to fund all operating losses of scl health medical group - billings, llc. In 2024, the hospital provided $41,531,867 in support of the losses of the physician clinics.on april 1, 2022, intermountain health care, inc. And sisters of charity of leavenworth health system, inc. Affiliated, creating a model health system that provides high-quality, accessible, and affordable healthcare to communities in Utah, Idaho, Nevada, Colorado, Montana, and Wyoming. The organization employs more than 68,000 caregivers, operates 33 hospitals (including one virtual hospital), and runs hundreds of clinics, while providing health insurance to over one million people in Utah, Idaho and Nevada.as part of intermountain health (integrated health system), scl health - Montana has direct access to best practices, resources, technology, talent and strategic capital. Scl health Montana has consistently been rated by press ganey in the top 95th percentile for patient experience.scl health - Montana has a variety of programs and services to serve the community including but not limited to:- cancer care- cardiothoracic and vascular medicine- emergency and trauma services (level ii trauma center)- family medicine- labor and delivery (level iii neonatal intensive care unit)- orthopedics- palliative care- pediatric intensive care unit- radiology, imaging and ancillary services- sports medicine- surgery center- therapy and rehab services- walk-in care 7 days a week- women's healthduring 2024, the following statistical data was gathered: admissions 12,433outpatient vists 238,904emergency department visits 39,233births 1,759surgeries 8,594laboratory tests 1,376,935mission, vision & valuesmission: we reveal and foster god's healing love by improving the health of thepeople and communities we serve, especially those
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 73
- Accountability: 87
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.2%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 87.2%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.5%; rating input score 99; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.3%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.61; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 84.2% of revenue deployed · 87.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 16 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $541.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.4M · 45 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 31 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 103 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.