Hshs Wisconsin Medical Group Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 264515959
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Springfield, IL, USA
- Phone
- 2173219292
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nonmonetary Support N.E.C.
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $27,531
- Expenses
- $45,780
- Assets
- $-1,241,105
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Kevin Lewis MD (PRESIDENT / HSHS Chief Clinical Officer)
- MELINDA CLARK (Former CEO MED GROUP)
Highest reported compensation
- Pavan Gupta MD (Board Member / Physician): $936,458 total reported compensation
- Michael Scialdone (Treasurer / HSHS SVP & CFO): $912,947 total reported compensation
- Kevin Lewis MD (PRESIDENT / HSHS Chief Clinical Officer): $884,394 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To reveal and embody christ's healing love for all people through a health care ministry by providing primary and specialty physician services to the communities hospital sisters health system serves.
What it reported doing in 2024
Hshs Wisconsin medical group, inc. ("mgwi") is a physician organization of hospital sisters health system ("hshs"), a health care ministry of the catholic church. As a mission-based organization, it is our desire to connect with all who seek care, healing and hope. Primarily the mission is filled through patient access of primary care providers, including family medicine, internal medicine and pediatrics. To ensure access to health care for all, a charity care policy has been implemented for all practices of the hshs medical group. The charity care policy helps ensure that all who come to us will receive quality care and are treated with respect and compassion. The hshs Wisconsin medical group charity care policy provides patients with an opportunity to qualify for financial assistance when receiving non-elective services. The level of charity care assistance for which any person is eligible is based, in part, on their income compared to the current year federal poverty guidelines. To qualify for charity care, a person completes a two-part income test. Part one determines that no other governmental or private insurance is available to the person and part two follows a process to determine the charity amount in relationship to the person's/family's income. The hshs Wisconsin medical group charity care program is based on the current year federal poverty guidelines ("fpg") issued by the department of health & human services annually and published in the federal register. An fpg and charity allowance table is updated annually by the hshs Wisconsin medical group and is used to determine whether the person qualifies for charity care and, if so, at what level. The amount is determined by multiplying the allowance level specified in the table by total charges calculated using the rate of 150% of the medicare allowable charge for each item or service rendered during the visit based on the applicable medicare locality. In carrying out its exempt purpose of ensuring patient access to high quality healthcare, mgwi established a medical practice in its western Wisconsin market with oakleaf clinics, inc. An integrated group medical practice consisting of six physician operating divisions. Mgwi's collaboration with oakleaf enables the organization to improve its ability to substantially deliver higher quality, cost effective care to the residents of western Wisconsin, deliver more comprehensive primary and specialty care to patients and be more effective in physician recruitment and the marketing and branding of their health care services, resulting in the ability to expand services provided. The oakleaf clinic discontinued operations as of 3/22/24.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 12
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 80%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 72.7%; rating input score 73; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -66.3%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: -27.11; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 1,010.3%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -15.2% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -24.1% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -6.7% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 80% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $37K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $936K · 15 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 14 of 15 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 32 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.