HSHS Medical Group Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
263956318
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Springfield, IL, USA
Phone
2173219292
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$128,939,203
Expenses
$198,588,507
Assets
$108,883,749
Liabilities
$46,009,101

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

21 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Kevin Lewis MD (PRESIDENT / HSHS Chief Clinical Officer)
  • MELINDA CLARK (Former CEO MED GROUP)

Highest reported compensation

  • Leslie Anewenah MD (Physician): $1,344,256 total reported compensation
  • Steven Morton MD (Physician): $1,225,777 total reported compensation
  • Peter Kim MD (Physician): $1,224,537 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To reveal and embody christ's healing love for all people through a health care ministry by providing primary and specialty physician services to the communities hospital sisters health system serves.

What it reported doing in 2024

Hshs medical group is the physician organization of hospital sisters health system ("hshs"), a health care ministry of the catholic church. As a mission-based organization, it is our desire to connect with all who seek care, healing, and hope. Primarily the mission is filled through patient access of primary care providers, including family medicine, internal medicine, and pediatrics. To ensure access to health care for all, a charity care policy has been implemented for all practices of the hshs medical group. The charity care policy helps ensure that all who come to us will receive quality care, and are treated with respect and compassion. The hshs medical group charity care policy provides patients with an opportunity to qualify for financial assistance when receiving non-elective services. The level of charity care assistance for which any person is eligible is based, in part, on their income compared to the current year federal poverty guidelines. To qualify for charity care, a person completes a two-part income test. Part one determines that no other governmental or private insurance is available to the person. Part two follows a process to determine the charity amount in relationship to the person's/family's income. The hshs medical group charity care program is based on the current year federal poverty guidelines ("fpg") issued by the department of health & human services annually and published in the federal register. An fpg and charity allowance table is updated annually by the hshs medical group and is used to determine whether the person qualifies for charity care and, if so, at what level. The amount is determined by multiplying the allowance level specified in the table by total charges calculated using the rate of 150% of the medicare allowable charge for each item or service rendered during the visit based on the applicable medicare locality.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 99% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 15
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 88.7%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 72.7%; rating input score 73; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -54%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.55; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.42; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.4% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 88.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $176.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.3M · 21 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $5.1M reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 32 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.