HSHS Good Shepherd Hospital Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 370512290
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Shelbyville, IL, USA
- Phone
- 2177743961
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $23,699,939
- Expenses
- $18,447,573
- Assets
- $25,875,332
- Liabilities
- $6,987,879
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Chad Markham (President/CEO)
- Aaron Puchbauer (Former PRESIDENT/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Michael Scialdone (Treasurer / HSHS SVP & CFO): $912,947 total reported compensation
- PATRICIA ALLEN (CFO - CARE DELIVERY (until 4/30/25)): $649,158 total reported compensation
- Chad Markham (President/CEO): $505,232 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To reveal and embody christ's healing love for all people through our high quality franciscan health care ministry.
What it reported doing in 2024
Emergency Services: The Emergency Department at HSHS Good Shepherd Hospital stands as a comprehensive treatment facility, ensuring continuous care with a dedicated team of specially trained physicians, nurses, and technicians available 24/7. Our commitment to quality patient care spans a broad spectrum of concerns. Leveraging advanced telemedicine, we have access to a diverse array of specialists who contribute to diagnosis and treatment for those in need of elevated care. Equipped with cutting-edge technology, we efficiently process x-rays, CT scans, and various diagnostic tests, facilitating swift and accurate diagnosis and treatment across a spectrum of medical areas, including: Stroke, Heart attack, Shortness of breath, Motor vehicle and other accidents, Broken bones, Abdominal pain, Lacerations, and Mental health issues. During FY25 the emergency department saw 4,782 patients of those 79% were admitted or placed in observation and 12% were transferred to a higher level of care.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 99% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Assets have declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 62
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 92
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 62.6%; rating input score 63
- Program expense ratio: 80.1%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 22.2%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.4; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.27; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.7%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.9% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 62.6% of revenue deployed · 80.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $14.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $913K · 20 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.5M reported
- Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 32 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 38/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.