Forest Hills of DC
Legal name: The Methodist Home of the District of Columbia
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 530207036
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Jul 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Washington, DC, US
- Phone
- 202-966-7623
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Supportive Housing for Older Adults
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $12,222,278
- Expenses
- $12,277,405
- Assets
- $37,356,806
- Liabilities
- $12,427,320
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
34 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT A LIEBREICH (GHI PRESIDENT AND CEO)
- TINA SANDRI (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ROBERT A LIEBREICH (GHI PRESIDENT AND CEO)
- TINA SANDRI (PRESIDENT)
- CRYSTAL SCOTT (ADMINISTRATOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Continually grow as a supportive community that inspires & engages seniors & their caregivers. In March 2025, Forest Hills of DC and Goodwin Living announced an affiliation with the goal of bringing more resources, programming and investment to uplift the lives of Forest Hills residents and team members. Under the terms of the affiliation, Goodwin Living will assume responsibility for the successful operations and service of Forest Hills. We are grateful to be able to continue the same excellent care and support that was the vision of our founders more than a century ago, offering assisted living, memory care, health care, nursing and in-patient and out-patient rehab. [](.
What it reported doing in 2025
To provide long-term health care services to its residents who are retired, aged, or required rehabilitation or post acute care. The home is licensed for 120 residents.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 93% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71.8%; rating input score 72
- Program expense ratio: 72.6%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.5%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.04; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.33; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.1% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 71.8% of revenue deployed · 72.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 34 people listed
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 7 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.