Goodwin House Development Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 020595161
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Alexandria, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7038241355
- Rating
- 41
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Senior Citizens' Housing/Retirement Communities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $337,060
- Expenses
- $404,898
- Assets
- $40,319,550
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT A LIEBREICH (PRESIDENT AND CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- ROBERT A LIEBREICH (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $770,678 total reported compensation
- TIMOTHY SMITH (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $514,955 total reported compensation
- CHANDRA KUMAR (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $482,990 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To support and extend the charitable and benevolent mission and purposes of goodwin house incorporated by developing additional retirement communities in the greater northern Virginia area.
What it reported doing in 2024
Goodwin house development corporation (ghdc) - provides support and extends the charitable and benevolent mission and purposes of goodwin house incorporated by developing additional retirement communities in the greater northern Virginia area, and whose primary focus will be to serve the needs of the elderly by providing care and services in accordance with the same exemplary standards enjoyed by the residents of the communities owned and operated by goodwin house incorporated. Ghdc provides services in affiliation with the episcopal dicese of Virginia through the oversight and coordination provided through the corporation's parent organization and sole member, goodwin house incorporated. Ghdc engages in and conducts all business necessary or suitable for the accomplishment of the above purposes.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
MIXED - Most voting board members are independent and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 58
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -20.1%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 99.58; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 170.6%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -46.2% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 36.6% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $771K · 14 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 7 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.