Goodwin House Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 541549749
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Alexandria, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7038241355
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,839,256
- Expenses
- $3,576,210
- Assets
- $39,434,166
- Liabilities
- $1,074,083
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
27 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT A LIEBREICH (PRESIDENT AND CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- ROBERT A LIEBREICH (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $770,678 total reported compensation
- TIMOTHY SMITH (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $514,955 total reported compensation
- VALERIE L BURKE (CHIEF PHILANTHROPY OFFICER): $346,060 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Through the power of philanthropy, we seek and celebrate generosity to carry out the mission of goodwin living, to provide financial security to residents, to enable staff to thrive in their careers, and to support innovation, (continued on schedule o)thus enhancing the lives of older adults and those who care for them.
What it reported doing in 2024
The foundation worked diligently to partner with its donors to support our team members as well. Through an incredible outpouring of generosity, we were able to provide $732,633 in funding for team members and their families. (please see details below.) some of the team member support came in tuition assistance grants and leadership opportunities. $255,073 funded 96 students in their educational journeys. Also, we were able to support again a cohort of team members for the advanced certified nursing assistant career ladder initiative which helped them gain important leadership training and advanced certification. We helped to support new nurses in our innovative nursing pathways program. We offered again this year additional funding for children and grandchildren of our team members to receive support for their higher education. 69 children and grandchildren of team members received grants of $500-$1,000 each to ease the burden of educational costs for a total of $68,500. This benefit was received extremely well in our community because many of our team members have completed their formal education yet have a strong desire to support their own children and grandchildren through college.other contributions were used to provide for the u.s. Citizenship application fee program supporting 23 of our staff members and 10 of their family members, totaling $23,938. We also provided course materials for our resident tutors who help our team members prepare for their naturalization test and interview. We believe this is an important program given that 50% of our staff members are foreign born and many wish to pursue u.s. Citizenship but are hindered by the high cost in fees. Out of this program, we also offered funding for daca, work permit and green card renewal fees. In addition, the foundation provided over $15,000 in critical funding for legal fees associated with immigration support services for team members.given the high cost of living in our area, many members of our team experience severe unexpected financial difficulties. We offered $103,115 for emergency financial assistance grants to 60 team members. These grants helped team members with overdue medical bills, unexpected car repairs, and assistance with rent under dire circumstances. This assistance provided comfort to those in need and allowed them to continue serving alongside our residents with dignity and maintain their exceptional standards of professionalism and compassion. We are grateful for members of the grants committee which volunteer their time on a weekly basis to evaluate and review grant applications. Their diligence and support help us to offer a fair and systematic approach to reviewing the financial grant applications. Grant recipients are required to complete at least three modules of the truist financial education curriculum at no cost to them. In doing so, the team members learn to set up a budget and save for emergencies as well as have the opportunity to explore other aspects of financial education and growth.we offered student loan repayment for our clinical team members at the same level of tuition benefits. This was especially meaningful for our clinical team members given that the average person had a student loan debt of over $130,000! Because of the generosity ofour donors, we were able to offer $131,150 in loan repayment for 31 clinical team members. Additionally, the anderson fund provided $10,000 in student loan repayment for 10 non clinical team members. We also provided an additional $157,885 for workforce development initiatives including providing stipends for 34 interns and the salary and benefits of our team member engagement and outreach manager position, who supports our team members with resources and manages our internship program, community partnerships and coordinates our internal leadership education program.these interns had valuable experiences that provided them the opportunity to witness the strong culture of belonging and co
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 74% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 58% for direct work, and 42% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 60
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 80
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 50.4%; rating input score 50
- Program expense ratio: 80.3%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $14.12 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 47.7%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.03; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 22.6%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 50.4% of revenue deployed · 80.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $2.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $771K · 27 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 8 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 49/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.