South Central Alpha Housing and Healthcare Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251701701
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7246584710
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nursing Services (General)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $508,178
- Expenses
- $403,800
- Assets
- $744,343
- Liabilities
- $549,115
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARK BONDI (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- BRYANT WESLEY ESQ (SECRETARY): $585,738 total reported compensation
- MARK BONDI (PRESIDENT): $520,155 total reported compensation
- NANCI CASE (DIRECTOR): $378,342 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide skilled nursing services to those in need. To treat all residents with hospitality and dignity. To efficiently and effectively use our human resources and material resources to deliver the highest standard of care and services. To create a positive environment for both residents and employees.
What it reported doing in 2024
To provide a skilled nursing facility to address the needs of a growing elderly population. This facility is specifically designed for senior residents who are unable to live on their own to allow them to age in a comfortable safe environment. The facility employs nurses who provide residents with 24 hours of emergency support which will give families and loved ones peace of mind. In addition, other provided services include meals, housekeeping, resident activities, wellness activities, and social services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 94% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 42
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 98.2%; rating input score 98
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 16.7%; rating input score 17; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 20.5%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.84; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.74; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 55.3%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -4.1% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -9.9% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78% of revenue deployed · 98.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $396K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $586K · 7 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $1.8M reported
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 137 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 17/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.