UPMCJameson Cancer Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 201459415
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021
- Location
- Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4126475765
- Rating
- 46
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $13,528
- Expenses
- $4,392
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEPHANIE DUTTON (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- STEPHANIE DUTTON (PRESIDENT): $409,852 total reported compensation
- KEVIN ROMBACH (SECRETARY/TREASURER): $124,087 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Upmc/jameson cancer center provides clinical oncology services to patients in western Pennsylvania and the surrounding tri-state areas.
What it reported doing in 2021
Upmc/jameson cancer center provides premier clinical oncology related services to patients and provides medical training to interns and residents and donates clinical research with protocols in the area of oncology treatment. See schedule o
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The strongest available result is that a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 51
- Transparency & Controls: 55
- Accountability: 32
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 32.5%; rating input score 32
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 67.5%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 1,155.9%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -72.1% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -72% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -26.3% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 32.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 2 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $410K · 2 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 13 of 14 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2017 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 141 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 32/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.