Senior Connection Center
Legal name: Senior Connection Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 592074063
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Tampa, FL, US
- Phone
- 1-800-96-ELDER
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Senior Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $42,392,685
- Expenses
- $41,795,016
- Assets
- $11,839,403
- Liabilities
- $7,028,976
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHARLOTTE MCHENRY (PRESIDENT AND CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- CHARLOTTE MCHENRY (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $191,316 total reported compensation
- CATHERINE PARKINSON (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $127,385 total reported compensation
- JODY BONE (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $124,983 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Senior Connection Center helps older adults and people with disabilities live safely and independently at home.
What it reported doing in 2024
Older americans act program - the older americans act program provides vital services that allow vulnerable seniors to remain in their homes, thereby avoiding unnecessary or premature nursing home placement. Services funded under this program include: our elder helpline, where we provide seniors and their caregivers with vital information and assist them in obtaining such critical services as in-home health care and adult day-care, and guidance in planning for the changing needs of older loved ones; legal assistance, which is provided to elders who are victims of scams, fraud, and other types of abuse or facing the threat of eviction, foreclosure or bankruptcy; and nutrition services, where balanced meals are provided, either in the home or at congregate dining sites so isolated seniors can benefit from socialization along with a good meal and respite services for caregivers, so caregivers can take a much-needed break from their continuous task of caring for a frail, older loved one. Additional services provided under this program include health and wellness education, including courses in chronic disease and diabetes self-management, homemaker and companion services, personal care for elders with limited capacity to tend to their activities of daily living, and elder abuse prevention, where not only elders are alerted to and educated about their risk of abuse, but business professionals and community members are also trained to identify potential victims of abuse.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 83% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 85% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.1%; rating input score 93
- Program expense ratio: 94.4%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.8%; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.4%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.28; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.59; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.2%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 5 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 93.1% of revenue deployed · 94.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $39.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $191K · 15 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $820K reported
- Consistency: 40 of 41 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 17 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 13 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Whistleblower policy not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.