Saxonburg Presbyterian Senior Housing I
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251589215
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Oakmont, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4128266030
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Low-Income & Subsidized Rental Housing
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $382,221
- Expenses
- $368,706
- Assets
- $335,733
- Liabilities
- $902,865
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- James B Pieffer (Director and President)
Highest reported compensation
- James B Pieffer (Director and President): $513,855 total reported compensation
- Todd Boslau (Director and Treasurer): $342,956 total reported compensation
- Celeste Golonski (Director and Secretary): $282,251 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
HUD subsidized affordable housing with supportive services for low income seniors who meet the income eligibility requirements of the HUD 202 Section 8 program.SeniorCare Network manages this community and provides or assists in the provision of services to meet individual resident needs. Typically, even though this community is a supportive housing facility, between 50-70% of our residents ae considered frail or at risk. To address these issues and the needs of those residing in this community, we employ a Service Coordinator to work with each resident as appropriate. The Service Coordinator assesses the needs of each resident and makes referrals to appropriate resources, such as families, senior centers, churches and other community groups. SeniorCare Network is an affiliate of Presbyterian SeniorCare, a not-for-profit, charitable organization established on January 25, 1928 which provides facilities, services and programs for enhancing the quality of life of older adults.
What it reported doing in 2025
Community provides affordable supportive housing for seniors who meet the income eligibility requirements of the HUD 202 Section 8 program. 100% of the 22-26 residents served daily meet these guidelines.The three most common areas where residents need assistance are transportation, housekeeping, and meals. Other services include social service coordination and other supportive and preventative programs to assist residents to age with choice, such as medication management, bathing, and IDL support. In addition, there is also a focus on prevention through education, health screenings, and wellness and activity programs to support the health of the community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 64% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 78
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.5%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 89.6%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 62.5%; rating input score 62; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.5%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.91; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.69; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 36.5%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -4.5% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.5% of revenue deployed · 89.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 8 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $330K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $514K · 11 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 44 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.