Run 4 Vets Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
460839165
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2015
Forms available
Form 990 2013, Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Alexandria, VA, USA
Phone
7035083833
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$1
Expenses
$22,746
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHN BRENDAN O'TOOLE (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • JOHN BRENDAN O'TOOLE (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
  • LISABETH HORRIGAN (VICE-PRES/DIRECTOR)
  • MICHAEL SIEGEL (SECRETARY/DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization is dedicated to educating the american public about key issues confronting veterans transitioning from military to civilian life. The main purpose of this organization is to promote positive mental, physical and social wellbeing for united states armed forces veterans.

What it reported doing in 2015

John brendan o'toole, president & director of the organization, started in november 2012 and completed in 2013, a run across 21 states in order to raise awareness and financial contributions for veterans. The organization provided pre-selected funding to nonprofit veteran organizations such as team red, white & blue; give an hour; post campaign. During 2014, brendan was invited by numerous veteran organizations to speak about his experiences during the run. In addition to the funding provided, the organization continued to work closely with team red white and blue and with give an hour. Give an hour has collaborated with brendan on a documentary film that would be about his run across the country. The organization concluded its mission in 2015, as brendan completed his collaboration on the documentary film and his discussions with other groups as to his experiences while running across america.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 85% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 92
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 78.9%; rating input score 79

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2,274,500%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -112.2% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -143.1% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -118.6% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 78.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $18K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2014 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.