Providencesaint John Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
480925688
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2013
Forms available
Form 990 2013
Location
Denver, CO, USA
Phone
9135964000
Rating
60
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health, General and Financing

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$800,965
Expenses
$326,393
Assets
$3,152,555
Liabilities
$17,590

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

23 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Randy Nyp (PRESIDENT/CEO- PMC)
  • Karla Kimerer (Executive Director)

Highest reported compensation

  • Randy Nyp (PRESIDENT/CEO- PMC): $358,852 total reported compensation
  • Karla Kimerer (Executive Director): $125,383 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We will, in the spirit of the sisters of charity, reveal god's healing love by improving the health of the individuals and communities we serve, especially those who are poor or vulnerable.

What it reported doing in 2013

It is the philosophy of the sisters of charity of leavenworth health system, inc. And affiliated hospitals to treat patients in a non-discriminatory manner, minimize human suffering as much as possible, create a preferential option for the poor and provide assistance to those patients who have limited financial resources. The hospital participates in the medicare and medicaid programs and as such provides care at reimbursement levels lower than charges. Providence/saint john foundation, inc. Provides funds for health-related services through related non-profit hospitals included in the hospital mission is service to the community in which it operates. To that end, the hospital has instituted and participates in the following community benefit activities; provides laboratory, radiological, and pharmaceutical service at duchesne clinic. Duchesne clinic is a clinic for the care of the medically indigent. Community health services provided at minimal or no charge: cholesteral screening, blood sugar screening, sibling preparation, lamaze childbirth classes, cancer support group, stroke support group, breast feeding support, hearing screening, cesarean birth classes, freedom from smoking, colorectal screening, nutritional counseling, hospital care, inpatient days of care, inpatient admissions, newborn deliveries, outpatient registrations, emergency room visits, clinic visits.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 66% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 37
  • Transparency & Controls: 65
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 87
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 30.6%; rating input score 31
  • Program expense ratio: 48.1%; rating input score 48
  • Fundraising efficiency: $8.53 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 91.2%; rating input score 91; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Limited
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 59.3%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.66; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.6%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 30.6% of revenue deployed · 48.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $157K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $359K · 23 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 24 of 26 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 43 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 31/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 48/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 36/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 45/100.