Parkview Wabash Hospital Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 351921445
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Wabash, IN, USA
- Phone
- 2603738429
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $356,117
- Expenses
- $360,073
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DEBRA POTEMPA (DIRECTOR/MARKET PRESIDENT)
- MICHAEL PACKNETT (FORMER OFFICER/RETIRED PH CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- MICHAEL PACKNETT (FORMER OFFICER/RETIRED PH CEO): $5,063,462 total reported compensation
- JEANNE' WICKENS (PH CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $2,443,396 total reported compensation
- DENA JACQUAY (DIRECTOR/PH CHIEF ADMIN OFFICER): $1,926,311 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To serve as the primary fundraising entity for parkview wabash hospital, inc. Funds are used for the continued improvement of the hospital's facilities, equipment, programs & services in accordance with the needs of the community where the hospital is located.
What it reported doing in 2023
Parkview wabash hospital foundation, inc. Is a collection of individuals, businesses, and institutional donors who recognize parkview wabash hospital, inc. As an agent for saving and changing lives and a vehicle for creating healthier communities for generations to come. Each gift to parkview wabash hospital foundation, inc. Is vital to the hospital's mission of improving the health of the community. In 2023, these gifts were used to enhance patient care as well as assisted in providing educational opportunities and scholarships for parkview wabash hospital (pwb) co-workers.(see schedule o for continuation)these are some notable ways that foundation gifts were used in 2023 to improve the health of the community: education and training:-co-workers and departments who seek to improve patient care and treatment through new programs or enhanced skills training annually approach the foundation for support. This fund is used to assist our driven and determined co-workers who choose to go above and beyond to provide even better care for parkview wabash hospital patients. In 2023, the foundation funded training and education by sending co-workers to one conference, the national rural healthcare association conference.maternal health education:-a mothers group was formed in 2023 at pwb that provides education and resources to new mothers from a maternal-infant educator. The foundation supported this initiative by providing resources for lactation consultation, play mats for the infants to use in the group setting, as well as supplies for education and training for the mothers. Home health and hospice:-parkview home health and hospice received foundation support to enhance patient care which made it possible for them to offer patient massages and music therapy, as well as providing bereavement care by providing chaplaincy visits, family support groups and bereavement materials for loved ones facing grief and loss.equipment:-the hospital was provided with a new real-time location system tracking equipment for wheelchairs and iv monitors through funding from the greatest need fund. -a new security system camera was installed at the pharmacy to increase security and keep patients safe through funding from the wabash county hospital fund. -the radiology fund provided the radiology department with a ct hugger for pediatric patients to use during scans and treatment. Medication assistance treatment (map) / intensive outpatient program (iop)center:-the foundation supported an expansion of the medication assistance treatment (map)/ intensive outpatient program (iop) center in 2023. The expansion created behavioral group therapy rooms, as well as individual treatment rooms to accommodate more patients enrolled in substance abuse and misue treatment.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 18
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 88.8%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 90.2%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: $86.92 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.1%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 193%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 88.8% of revenue deployed · 90.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $325K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $5.1M · 11 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2010 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 41 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.