Missouri Behavioral Health Council
Legal name: Missouri Coalition for Community Behavioral Healthcare
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 431148537
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Jefferson City, MO, United States
- Phone
- (573) 634-4626
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $44,271,600
- Expenses
- $43,532,056
- Assets
- $12,436,152
- Liabilities
- $5,042,329
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
34 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRENT MCGINTY (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- BRENT MCGINTY (PRESIDENT & CEO): $608,583 total reported compensation
- MARK SCHWARTZ (EVP, GOV'T RELATIONS): $301,209 total reported compensation
- RACHELLE GLAVIN (EVP, STRATEGIC INITIATIVES): $288,099 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Advocating for Behavioral Health in Missouri. Our network of member agencies throughout the state provides a comprehensive array of psychiatric and substance use treatment services and supports as appropriate for children/adolescents, adults, and senior adults. In addition to supporting our members, the Council develops programs and promotes best practices that improve behavioral health in Missouri—anywhere the system and individual meet. Public Policy Advocacy. The Council is a collaborative association that is structured and guided by consistent feedback from our member agencies. Our team hosts and organizes a robust committee and workgroup schedule to provide ample opportunity for discussions, collaborations, problem-solving, and decisions on emerging issues, as well as sharing successful strategies and ideas with peers. All member agency chief executives and delegates sit on the...
What it reported doing in 2024
The community mental health liasion (cmhl) program is part of the strengthening mental health initiative. Thirty+ cmls work across the state to assist law enforcement and courts; in fy22, that number over-doubled due to program expansion statewide. The cbhl coordinator works in the council office. The goal is to form better community partnerships among community mental health centers, law enforcement, and courts to save valuable resources that might otherwise be expended on unnecessary jail, prison, and hospital stays and to improve outcomes for individuals with behavioral health issues. Liasions also follow up with the missourians referred to them in order to track progress and ensure success. Through the cbhl program, individuals with behavioral health issues who frequent interaction with law enforcement and the courts will have improved access to behavioral health treatment.in january 2016, the ere and cit programs were added to this category. The council provides management of the emergency enhancement initiative. This includes data collection and outcome reporting responsibilities. Data-related expenses include license fees, data warehouse fees, and data analytic tool costs. Other expenses include travel, meeting expenses, training materials, and staff development.the council also AIDS in managing the crisis intervention training initiative (cit).cit training: the coalition supports the cit executive council in planning the annual cit conference. The coalition works with the cit executive council to financially support Missouri individuals who wish to attend and/or present at the international cit conference. The coalition supports the cit coordinator in the development of cit programs. A law enforcement officer is employed at 75-90% fte to promote and educate the law enforcement community about the cit program.healthcare home: emphasizes coordination of care by utilizing electronic health records and case management to manage medical diseases and improve health and wellness for individuals with severe mental illness. Designed to extend life expectancy of people with smi. Supports the implementation and training of staff for cmhc healthcare homes. Cmhc's have become healthcare homes for missourians who are medicaid eligible participants with chronic illnesses. Provides data analytics for healthcare home clients.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 78% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 54% for direct work, and 46% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 90.1%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 91.6%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.7%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.29; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.41; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.5%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 25.5% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 24.3% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.8% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 90.1% of revenue deployed · 91.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 27 of 27 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $39.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $609K · 34 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $9.6M reported
- Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 22 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 17 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 55/100.