North Central Missouri Mental Health Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 431029409
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Trenton, MO, USA
- Phone
- 6603594487
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Mental Health Center
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $13,926,551
- Expenses
- $12,085,644
- Assets
- $12,878,823
- Liabilities
- $2,043,133
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LORI IRVINE (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
- KELLI HILLERMAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- NIKKI HINKLE (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- DR KENNETH D RICHARDS (DOCTOR): $340,040 total reported compensation
- LORI IRVINE (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $192,593 total reported compensation
- JAN ALTISER (NURSE PRACTITIONER): $148,085 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Nc mo mental health center delivers high quality trauma-informed behavioral health services in a caring and compassionate atmosphere that promotes dignity, builds on natural supports, encourages consumer choice, embraces cultural diversity, and empowers individual achievements.
What it reported doing in 2024
Behavioral health crisis center - the behavioral health crisis center provides immediate, short-term care for individuals experiencing a mental health or substance-use crisis, offering assessment, stabilization, and connection to ongoing services. Referrals come from hospitals, law enforcement, emergency responders, community providers, and self-referrals and walk-ins are always accepted. Services delivered at the crisis center are integrated into the organizations continuum of care and are included as part of the overall cost report for reimbursement and reporting purposes. 0 clients received services for the year as opening date was 10-1-25 and cost incurred were start-up costs only.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 66
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68.1%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 79.2%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 13.2%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.07; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.9%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.4% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.3% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 68.1% of revenue deployed · 79.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 9 filed program accomplishments · $9.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $340K · 13 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $985K reported
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.