Midwest Community Health Associates Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 341045870
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Bryan, OH, USA
- Phone
- 2603738429
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $42,617,341
- Expenses
- $48,057,598
- Assets
- $9,095,479
- Liabilities
- $88,740,624
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GREG JOHNSON (DIRECTOR/REGIONAL MARKET PRESIDENT)
- RAYMOND DUSMAN (DIRECTOR/CHAIR/PCE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- RAYMOND DUSMAN (DIRECTOR/CHAIR/PCE PRESIDENT): $2,310,580 total reported compensation
- JEANNE' WICKENS (PH CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER/PRTL YR): $1,865,163 total reported compensation
- GREG JOHNSON (DIRECTOR/REGIONAL MARKET PRESIDENT): $1,595,130 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Midwest community health associates, inc. Works to improve the health of our communities and provides quality health services to all who entrust their care to us.
What it reported doing in 2024
Midwest community health associates, inc. (mcha) is a multi-specialty medical group specializing in family medicine, pediatrics, audiology, cardiology, gastroenterology, otolaryngology, wound care, medical oncology, radiation oncology, pain management, physical medicine & rehabilitation, podiatry, orthopedics, general surgery, ob/gyn, sleep medicine, dermatology, diabetes management, pharmaceutical management, walk-in clinics, physical & occupational therapy, laboratory and imaging services. The providers include physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, pharmacists, physical therapists, athletic trainers, occupational therapists, laboratory techs, and radiology techs. (see schedule o for continuation) mcha provides various services at its six offices in bryan, montpelier, archbold, hicksville, wauseon, and sherwood, Ohio. Services are offered monday through friday at these locations. Most offices provide late hours at least one day per week to expand access to the community. The bryan location consists of the above specialties, collaborating with the local hospital, health departments, and other health care providers. Mcha provides athletic trainers for community school sports programs. Several providers are present at the local high school games for potential injuries. Sponsorships, presentations, and other educational opportunities at community career events with local schools and colleges were provided limitedly. We also offer mentoring and internships for college and high school students, as well as internships for mid-level and physicians. Various physicians and leaders participated in local community committees (local hospital, health department, black swamp, united way, ymca, rotary, nami, sufficient grace ministries, etc.). Providers continued to volunteer services at the local underserved/free clinics. Ongoing financial support was provided to a local college, northwest state community college. Mcha continues to provide financial assistance to patients regardless of their ability to pay. Support services for community care, such as an ob navigator, cancer navigator, etc., were provided to help streamline care for patients. Mcha is a certified healthcare facility and offers ancillary services at a lower cost (outpatient setting) such as x-ray, ct, nuclear medicine, bone density, mammograms, ultrasounds, breast care, lab, etc.. The organization participates with local health care facilities in the community health assessment to help create/develop the plan, as well as be participants in improving the health and well-being of the community (i.e., transportation, telehealth services, cancer screenings, mental health, and healthy behaviors, etc.).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 32
- Sustainability: 8
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 97.7%; rating input score 98
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -12.8%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 9.76; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.7%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -6.8% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 97.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 2 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $46.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $2.3M · 10 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.3M reported
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 32 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.