Louis D Srybnik Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 271884792
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 9144780503
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Named Trusts N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $268,489
- Expenses
- $665,393
- Assets
- $6,894,010
- Liabilities
- $513
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DARBY MACFARLANE TRAMONTINE (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
- LYNDA RUFO (VICE PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- SCARLETT MACFARLANE (PROGRAM DIRECTOR/DIR.): $54,854 total reported compensation
- LESLIE FOGLESONG (SECRETARY/TREASURER/DIR.): $47,500 total reported compensation
- LYNDA RUFO (VICE PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR): $36,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
A non-profit organization that contributes funds and provides support through direct annual grants and also works with and provides services to 501(c)(3) non-profit organizations to increase public awareness, funding, support and (continued on schedule o)(continued from page 2) implementation for a) programs that enable young people under the age of 35 in the arts, education, science, religion, health, safety, fitness, personal rehabilitation and medical care b) programs to provide safety and medical care for children and animals and c) programs in medical research.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provides support through direct annual grants and provides promotional services to further provide support and raise public awareness, funding and support for programs in education, benefitting persons under the age of 35 including grants, website design and social media support for two 501(c)(3) foundations.a) united way program #1: united-2-read early literacy program and summer learning program for underprivileged children focuses on early literacy so children can read on level at end of 3rd grade of school fostering successful students and stable families and households by providing support to students most in need. The program is currently in its 8th year and since inception has provided over (continued on schedule o)(continued from page 2) 20,000 children's books and 5,000 reading kits to underprivileged pre-school age children, as well as helping 750 low-income households with school-age children during 2024 school break with weekly nutritious food, backpacks and school supplies. The program is an ongoing program throughout the year, distributed to parents and caregivers, or early childhood centers and daycare locations who assist in implementing the reading kit curriculum to the children. Recently the program was selected by scholastics, the global children's publishing company, as a recipient of 5,000 free new children's books. United way regularly acknowledges volunteers and donors throughout the reading kit process as without them the project would not be possible. Program #2: the united for seniors program has a particular focus on positive health and behavioral health for at-risk seniors (age 60+). This addresses social isolation by pairing older adults with volunteer, health-profession college students for in-home and community support and non-medical assistance, particularly with independent activities of daily living, with improving their technology skills for better communication, and identifying risks, safety needs, health concerns and care requirements for program staff follow-up. United way partners with local colleges to identify, recruit and screen health profession students as program volunteers. The program began in 2021 and has successfully matched seniors/students to date.b) bard collegebard college's bard high school early college program for disadvantaged young people in public schools. Bard early college leads a national network of public high schools that enable disadvantaged young people to complete two years of tuition free college education credit during the traditional four years of high school. This makes it possible for high school students who face significant obstacles to college completion to earn 60 college credits and an associate in arts degree concurrently with a high school diploma, tuition free. Over 2,700 students are enrolled nationwide. One program supported is the "college access for nyc public high school students", offering tuition-free college courses of study for credit-bearing college education, during high school years.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 66% for direct work, and 34% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 18
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 77.1%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $0 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.4%; rating input score 99; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -147.8%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.36; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.3%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.3% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -63.1% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -5% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 77.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 5 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $513K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $55K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 10 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 1/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 59/100.