Bard College

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
141713034
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Annandale-on-Hudson, NY, United States
Phone
8457587511
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
University or Technological Institute

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$930,316,002
Expenses
$408,373,029
Assets
$1,707,357,698
Liabilities
$642,831,896

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

46 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LEON BOTSTEIN (PRESIDENT/TRUSTEE)
  • GIDEON LESTER (ARTISTIC DIRECTOR AND CEO)
  • TOM ECCLES (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR CCS)
  • KAREN ZORN (PRESIDENT, LONGY)

Highest reported compensation

  • LEON BOTSTEIN (PRESIDENT/TRUSTEE): $689,293 total reported compensation
  • TOM ECCLES (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR CCS): $529,440 total reported compensation
  • JONATHAN BECKER (EXECUTIVE VP): $459,124 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Bard College seeks to inspire curiosity, a love of learning, idealism, and a commitment to the link between higher education and civic participation. Undergraduates at the Annandale campus come from all regions of the country. Over 18 percent of the student body is international, representing more than 40 countries. Undergraduates share the campus with the students and faculty of a conservatory of music and several graduate programs, which present lectures, concerts, and exhibitions that are open to the entire College community. Affiliated programs and research centers, such as the Fisher Center for Performing Arts, Levy Economics Institute, Hessel Museum of Art, Bard Field Station, and Hannah Arendt Center for Politics and Humanities, also enrich student life. Read Bard’s Mission Statement Bard by the Numbers.

What it reported doing in 2024

Bard college is an independent, comprehensive liberal arts college located on a park-like campus that covers more than 1,500 acres bordering the hudson river. Bard has developed a new vision and model of the liberal arts college, as a central body surrounded by significant institutes and programs - "satellites" - that strengthen its' curriculum. While it is flexible enough to include programs for research, graduate study, community outreach, and other cultural and educational activities, the undergraduate program remains its focus. Each satellite program is designed to enhance the undergraduate course of study by offering students opportunities for interaction with leading artists and scholars. In addition to the undergraduate college, bard has undertaken a number of important educational initiatives that include but are not limited to the following: during 1979, bard assumed control and ownership of simon's rock early college (now called bard college at simon's rock) (simon's rock) located in great barrington, Massachusetts. Although bard and simon's rock remain distinct and carry on separate academic programs at their respective campuses, the relationship between the two institutions gives bard an exceptional opportunity to apply its experience as a liberal arts college to the development of a strong curriculum for younger students. In march 1986, bard established the levy economics institute of bard college, which is dedicated to improving the human condition through the study of economics and the generation of effective public policy responses to important problems worldwide. During 1992, bard entered into an operating agreement with the iris foundation to establish and maintain the bard graduate center for studies in the decorative arts, design, and culture (bgc). Since 1993, the bgc has presented a unique, multidisciplinary, and broadly international approach to the study of the decorative arts. The bgc offers a masters of arts degree in the history of the decorative arts and a doctor of philosophy degree in the history of the decorative arts, design, and culture. It sponsors several major exhibitions annually and presents diverse public programs for audiences ranging from decorative arts professionals and collectors to schoolchildren. The bgc is located in New York city, in two beaux arts townhouses close to the city's leading museums and galleries, and, in bard hall. During 2003, the richard b. Fisher center for the performing arts at bard college (fisher center) was opened offering a world-class complex for innovative artistic representation. The fisher center is home to bard college's theater and dance programs, as well as the bard music festival, and host to performances by the american symphony orchestra. Generally, the fisher center provides audiences with a bold and dynamic environment that inspires risk-taking performance and provocative programs in orchestral, chamber, and jazz music and theater, dance and opera by american and international artists. During 2011, bard also assumed control and ownership of ecla - european college of liberal arts ggmbh, now called bard college berlin, ggmbh and bard real estate gmbh, a german entity holding title to all but one of bard college berlin, ggmbh's land and buildings. Bard college berlin, ggmbh is a liberal arts university offering an innovative, interdisciplinary curriculum with a global sensibility. Students come to berlin from 30 countries in order to study with the international faculty. Bard college berlin, ggmbh is a registered as a separate 501(c)(3) organization. Bard real estate gbmh is a for-profit entity subject to german taxation. During 2012, bard assumed control and ownership of longy school of music, now called the longy school of music of bard college (longy), located in cambridge, Massachusetts. Longy is a leading degree-granting conservatory and school of continuing and preparatory studies and offers eleven programs leading to a master of music degree

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 67% for direct work, and 33% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 85
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 84
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 41.3%; rating input score 41
  • Program expense ratio: 91.4%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: $141.13 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Pass
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 84%; rating input score 84; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 56.1%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.18; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.38; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.1%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 3 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 41.3% of revenue deployed · 91.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 21 of 25 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $373.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $689K · 46 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $53M reported
  • Consistency: 47 of 47 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 14 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 16 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 41/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 6 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.