Hospice Services Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
251468529
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Butler, PA, USA
Phone
7242826806
Rating
57
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospices

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,366,025
Expenses
$5,092,277
Assets
$849,726
Liabilities
$4,999,319

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAVID J FENOGLIETTO (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • DAVID J FENOGLIETTO (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $502,791 total reported compensation
  • JEFFREY L CARRAWAY (CFO): $268,264 total reported compensation
  • SAMANTHA RAPUK (SECRETARY/TREASURER): $186,436 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

When facing a health challenge, everyone will have access to the appropriate care to meet their physical, emotional, and spiritual needs providing abundant life and enabling them to remain independent in the setting where they are most comfortable.

What it reported doing in 2024

Certified hospice benefit hospice services are primarily funded by the medicare hospice benefit and private insurances that also offer the hospice benefit. Hospice care includes four levels of hospice care including routine hospice, respite care, general inpatient hospice, and continuous care hospice services. Services included with hospice care for patients who are terminally ill requiring medical and treatment care include skilled nursing, therapy, home health aide, social work, spiritual, and volunteer services. A total of 358 new hospice patients were admitted into the vna hospice program during fy25 for a total of 27,994 hospice days and 18,167 visits provided for the year ending june 30, 2025.palliative care services specialized certified home health care funded by medicare, and various private insurance contracts. Services provided for palliative care patients require advanced care services including skilled nursing, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, social work, and home health aide services. These services are offered to patients that are diagnosed with an advanced illness in order to provide quality of life while undergoing their treatment plan of care. A total of 244 patients were admitted into the vna palliative care program and 2,988 visits completed during fy25 ending june 30, 2025.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 45
  • Transparency & Controls: 66
  • Accountability: 87
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 49.8%; rating input score 50
  • Program expense ratio: 52.5%; rating input score 53
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.1%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.17; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 5.88; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.9%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -7.7% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3.4% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -11.1% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 49.8% of revenue deployed · 52.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $503K · 10 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $415K reported
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 21 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 53/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 54/100.