Behome Partners

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
202932676
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Cranberry Township, PA, USA
Phone
7247422246
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health Treatment Facilities, Primarily Outpatient

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$142,950
Expenses
$146,912
Assets
$122,468
Liabilities
$2,417,181

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • DAVID J FENOGLIETTO (CHAIRMAN): $502,791 total reported compensation
  • JEFFREY L CARRAWAY (TREASURER): $268,264 total reported compensation
  • MARGIE WALSH (SECRETARY): $220,408 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

When facing a health challenge, everyone will have access to the appropriate care to meet their physical, emotional, and spiritual needs providing abundant life and enabling them to remain independent in the setting where they are most comfortable.

What it reported doing in 2024

Behome partners inc. Consists of three divisions of services:1. Behome partners is a licensed homecare company that is primarily funded by self-pay and third party insurance sources. Services offered through behome partners includes personal care, caregiver, home health aide, home helpers, and nursing services. Behome services are offered to patients requiring services that are not covered by certified home health or hospice services. 2. Behome partners also provides home technology services through the behome hometech program including home medication dispensers and personal emergency response systems (pers).3. Behome also provides professional services for individuals and organizations under the behome professional services division. This includes physician directed specialty services that do not meet certified home health requirements for admission.behome partners has redefined its service area with a concentration of services to specific residential communities. Behome partners provided 5,038 hours of services through the programs during fy25 ending june 30, 2025. The average daily census of pers units provided to consumers was 212 in fy25.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 17
  • Transparency & Controls: 66
  • Accountability: 37
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 20%; rating input score 20
  • Program expense ratio: 19.5%; rating input score 19
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.8%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.83; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 19.74; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 82.7%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -19.8% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -10.1% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -11.2% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 20% of revenue deployed · 19.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 4 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $29K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $503K · 4 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 21 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 20/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 19/100.
  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.