Good Samaritan Medical Center Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
841649162
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2020
Location
Lafayette, CO, USA
Phone
8018427851
Rating
56
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$535,978
Expenses
$449,092
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TYLER WILTGEN (INTERIM VP PHILANTHROPY PEAKS/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ()

Highest reported compensation

  • KEVIN JENKINS (TRUSTEE (PARTIAL)): $691,226 total reported compensation
  • EDWARD PYUN MD (TRUSTEE): $596,182 total reported compensation
  • DAWN ANUSZKIEWICZ (TRUSTEE (PARTIAL)): $307,223 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Helping people live the healthiest lives possible.

What it reported doing in 2025

Good samaritan medical center first opened its doors to the community in december 2004. The good samaritan medical center foundation was established the same year to provide a way for the community to support the hospital.the foundation works with donors to ensure that medical excellence and compassionate care are always available in the community we serve. Partnering with donors, we are able to enhance the care the medical center provides to patients and their families.good samaritan medical center and the foundation were part of the sisters of charity of leavenworth health system. On april 1, 2022, intermountain health care, inc. And sisters of charity of leavenworth health system, inc. Merged, creating a model health system that provides high-quality, accessible, and affordable healthcare to communities in Utah, Idaho, Nevada, Colorado, Montana, and Wyoming. The organization employs more than 69,000 caregivers, operates 34 hospitals (including one virtual hospital), and runs hundreds of clinics, while providing health insurance to more than one million members in Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, and Utah.in order to operate more efficiently, the decision was made to consolidate the various foundations operated as part of sisters of charity of leavenworth health system. This return is marked final; however, good samaritan medical center foundation will continue to operate as a dba under intermountain healthcare foundation, inc. (fein 80-0225150).some of our area's of focus are:- patient assistance: through the generosity of our donors, the foundation has funds available to support patients in need so they can focus their energy where it should be - on their health.- medical education: the foundation has a variety of education and scholarship funds, supported by our donors, through which scholarships are awarded to associates who are advancing their knowledge through college and other training programs.- program and project funds: our donors invest in programs and projects at the medical center to ensure that the very best care is always available right here in our neighborhood. These gifts are an investment in the health of our community.- community health and wellness: the foundation works in-conjunction with several local partners by investing in projects that enhance life and health in the community we love. Good samaritan medical center foundation provides and manages the following grant funds.-humanitarian loan fund: to provide grants and no interest loans to gsmc associates who are facing hardships.-general patient assistance fund: to provide support to gsmc patients with no or limited resources. The fund does not pay the cost of medical care but has assisted patients with rent, food, and other items they need.-cardiac care fund: to pay for programs, projects and other needs of the gsmc cardiac care program and patients.-david hamm legacy fund: to provide scholarships to gsmc associates who are pursuing education that improves and enhances patient care.-rehab patient assistance fund: to provide assistance to gsmc patients who have financial need.-nicu fund: to support programs and projects in the gsmc neonatalintensive care unit.-busch family scholarship fund: to provide scholarships to gsmc associates who are pursuing education that improves and enhances patient care.-simulation lab fund: to support training and the purchase of equipment in the gsmc simulation lab.

Operating model

Revenue model
Affiliate-supported. 60% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 85% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 31
  • Transparency & Controls: 76
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 32.6%; rating input score 33
  • Program expense ratio: 34.4%; rating input score 34
  • Fundraising efficiency: $3.89 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 16.2%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 66.8%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 32.6% of revenue deployed · 34.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 6 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $155K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $691K · 15 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 83 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 33/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 34/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 12/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.