Florence Crittenton Programs Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
550365158
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Wheeling, WV, USA
Phone
3042427060
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Residential Care & Adult Day Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$8,372,450
Expenses
$7,383,360
Assets
$3,362,014
Liabilities
$101,322

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • EDWARD GEORGE III (PRESIDENT)
  • TAMMY J POPPE (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DR ASHLEIGH PARKER (PRESIDENT & CHIEF EXECUTIV)

Highest reported compensation

  • DR ASHLEIGH PARKER (PRESIDENT & CHIEF EXECUTIV): $127,608 total reported compensation
  • AMY BACCELLIERE (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $110,529 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission statement of the organization is "embracing children and families in need with nurturing services to help them achieve self-sufficiency." the agency's goal is to effectively and efficiently merge child welfare services with behavioral health treatment by providing an array of treatment options to meet the community needs. The goal is to set industry standards of quality and service in the treatment of children and families that specialize in adolescent pregnancy, parenting and prevention, family advocacy and community services that help families achieve health, happiness, and self sufficiency.

What it reported doing in 2024

Trama informed care: crittenton services inc. Provides a continuum of behavioral health services with residential care for girls 12-21 and outpatient community-based care throughout West Virginia.in 2009, crittenton made a commitment to trauma-informed practice and organizational culture by partnering with the trauma center at the justice resource institute to integrate the arc trauma treatment framework within all levels of the agency's work. Crittenton uses the ace (adverse childhood experience) survey for a snapshot of trauma history, completes a cans assessment for each child, and links the results to the arc treatment framework to develop an arc treatment plan. Willow tree learing academy: licensed pre-k and before/after school care in Ohio county schools. We help children prepare for school; strive to promote caring and sharing; give children the opportunity to play in a supervised setting with children of their own age; offer a safe, structured environment for before and after school care offering security and resilence promoting children; partner with the West Virginia office of child nutrition, following the child and adult care food program guidelines for healthy meals and snacks.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 88.2%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.8%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.46; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 88.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $7.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $128K · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.