Crittenton Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 550751699
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Wheeling, WV, USA
- Phone
- 3042427060
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $464,954
- Expenses
- $357,609
- Assets
- $3,506,053
- Liabilities
- $766,111
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- EDWARD GEORGE III (PRESIDENT)
- TAMMY POPPE (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- DR ASHLEIGH PARKER (PRESIDENT & CHIEF EXECUTIV)
Highest reported compensation
- DR ASHLEIGH PARKER (PRESIDENT & CHIEF EXECUTIV): $127,608 total reported compensation
- AMY BACCELLIERE (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $110,529 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of crittenton foundation, inc is to pursue funding for the related non-profit crittenton organizations and to prudently manage the endowment. Founded nationally by charles crittenton, the agency has been serving West Virginia's young people and their families since 1895. The agency's goal is to effectively and effciently merge child welfare services with behavioral health treatment by providing n array of treatment options to meet the community needs. The agency strives to set industry standards of quality and service int the treatment of children and families that specialize in adolescent pregnancy, parenting and prevention, family advocacy, and community services that help families acheive health, happiness, and self-sufficiency.
What it reported doing in 2024
Their exempt purpose acheivement is that they pursued funding, managed the endowment, and held fundraising event to help further the mission of the crittenton family of organizations, so that they can provide the highest quality behavioral health, maternity and childcare service to all families they serve.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 54
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 65
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 61%; rating input score 61
- Program expense ratio: 54.3%; rating input score 54
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.31 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 85.6%; rating input score 86; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 23.1%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.8; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 61% of revenue deployed · 54.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $194K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $128K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 15/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.