Delivering Good Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
133300271
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
2122795493
Rating
90
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Support N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$135,501,368
Expenses
$135,822,567
Assets
$3,186,295
Liabilities
$501,165

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

43 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MATTHEW JOSEPH FASCIANO (PRESIDENT & CEO)
  • ELIOT ROSENFIELD (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • MATTHEW JOSEPH FASCIANO (PRESIDENT & CEO): $420,300 total reported compensation
  • RON H ROSTOW (CHIEF FINANCIAL & ADMIN.): $202,237 total reported compensation
  • MERRIE L KELLER (DIR. OF PRODUCT PROCUREMENT): $195,749 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Delivering good helps people facing hardship and disaster move forward by working with our partners to match them with new, essential items and services - providing care that supports dignity, renews hope, and opens doors to opportunity.

What it reported doing in 2024

Other programs - delivering good conducts a range of additional, innovative programs to provide useful, new products to people in need. These include: - retail programs - delivering good's retail program matches community partners with local stores of national retailers to secure donations of necessary merchandise for children, adults and families in need. These programs provide an opportunity for companies to give back in a meaningful way, and present an efficient, uniform donation process across stores in local communities. - disaster relief - as part of our specialist efforts to assist communities affected by natural emergency, delivering good assisted residents of North Carolina and Georgia following the devastating impacts of hurricane helene in 2024. Thanks to a generous grant from the hearst foundations, delivering good distributed more than $5 million worth of clothing and relief supplies to displaced victims of flooding, reaching approximately 30,000 families and individuals recovering from the disaster.delivering good also partnered with West Virginia voad for the second year of an ongoing program to supply them with clothing and supplies to be warehoused and rapidly distributed at times of distress and emergency in West Virginia throughout the year, a program that can be adopted in the future in other states. - partnership impact and enhancement - each year, delivering good convenes a day-long community partner impact summit, bringing together representatives from our nationwide network of community nonprofits that encompasses 800 local organizations at all. This day-long function allows community organizations to meet, collaborate, discuss, and learn from expert session-leaders as well as one another.as a supplement to this, delivering good hosts quarterly "office hours" to answer questions and take part in one-on-one guidance and assistance for our nonprofit partners. Together, these efforts provide a unique and vital resource that makes the entire ecosystem of nonprofit charities stronger across the united states.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 99% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 98
  • Transparency & Controls: 83
  • Accountability: 98
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 99.1%; rating input score 99
  • Program expense ratio: 98.8%; rating input score 99
  • Fundraising efficiency: $191.58 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 97.4%; rating input score 97; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.2%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.02; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.8%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 99.1% of revenue deployed · 98.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 37 of 38 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $134.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $420K · 43 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $400K reported
  • Consistency: 38 of 38 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 136 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 131 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.