Community Hospital of Noble County Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 352089183
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Kendallville, IN, USA
- Phone
- 2603738429
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $87,067
- Expenses
- $356,515
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JORDI DISLER (DIRECTOR/MARKET PRESIDENT)
- GARY ADKINS (DIRECTOR/PARTIAL YR/MARKET PRESIDENT)
- MICHAEL PACKNETT (FORMER OFFICER/RETIRED PH CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- MICHAEL PACKNETT (FORMER OFFICER/RETIRED PH CEO): $5,063,462 total reported compensation
- JEANNE' WICKENS (PH CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $2,443,396 total reported compensation
- DENA JACQUAY (DIRECTOR/PH CHIEF ADMIN OFFICER): $1,926,311 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To serve as the primary fundraising entity for community hospital of noble county, inc. Funds are used for the continued improvement of the hospital's facilities, equipment, programs & services in accordance with the needs of the community where the hospital is located.
What it reported doing in 2023
The mission of the parkview foundations is to inspire the generous spirit of our community that brings gifts of healing and comfort to everyone parkview serves.the community hospital of noble county foundation, inc., d.b.a. Parkview noble foundation, adheres to this mission. The foundation raises funds to support new programs and services, educational needs, and innovative technology for the community hospital of noble county, inc., d.b.a. Parkview noble hospital, with the ultimate goal of enabling this community hospital to provide the "above and beyond" care and services that would not be possible without the support of parkview noble foundation donors. (see schedule o for continuation)the gifts received in 2023 by parkview noble foundation were designated to temporarily restricted or unrestricted funds, according to donor wishes, and were used for a number of mission-driven purposes that touched the lives of parkview noble hospital patients and their families in numerous ways. The following are examples of parkview noble foundation providing funding to parkview noble hospital for various hospital programs, services, equipment, and improvements: special touch fund: -the special touch fund provided a nebulizer to a patient who was suffereing with asthma. This equipment was not covered under the patient's insurance and was needed to help with recovery. The special touch fund also provided gas gift cards to patients who needed transportation to their appointments in fort wayne, in. Patients were also provided lymphedema garments. Co-worker emergency fund:-the co-worker emergency fund assisted co-workers facing emergencies such as a health emergency, domestic violence or other life crisis. This fund provided payments for rent, utilities and addressed food insecurity. Scholarships:-scholarship funds provided team members financial assistance as they pursued their healthcare career. One scholarship was provided to a high school student purusuing a nursing degree and one scholarship was awarded to a co-worker working on their nursing degree.medication assistance program: -medication assistance program (map) provided patients with help covering costs of prescriptions necessary for discharge.diabetes awareness and education: -diabetes education supplies were provided for patients.family birthing center: -the family birthing center was provided with a pack 'n play portable crib. Home health and hospice funds:-the foundation funded services provided by parkview home health and hospice to noble county residents. These services included massages for patients, educational materials, pill boxes and bereavement groups for families facing grief and loss.greatest need fund: -the greatest need fund provided equipment and education for patients. Items that were provided includeded breakroom updates for therapy, accessories for the da vinci robotic surical device and the pharmacy utility cart.noble building fund:-parkview noble building fund provided the hospital with av upgrades for their confernece room.community health education fund:-community health education fund provided support to the community with rock steady boxing at the ymca for senior citizens.meditation garden fund:-meditation garden fund provided upkeep and improvement to the meditation garden located on the parkview noble hospital grounds. Parkview noble therapy fund:-parkview noble therapy fund provided training and education to the staff and therapists.parkview auxillary fund:-parkview auxiliary fund supported the needs of the hospital by providing translation devices for registration areas.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 99
- Transparency & Controls: 67
- Accountability: 75
- Sustainability: 6
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 96.6%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: $471.15 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 98.8%; rating input score 99; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 72.7%; rating input score 73; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -309.5%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 211.3%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 96.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 11 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $345K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $5.1M · 14 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 16 of 17 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 42 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.