Charitable Foundation of the Islands Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 274027791
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Sanibel, FL, USA
- Phone
- 2393223818
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community, Neighborhood Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,293,026
- Expenses
- $1,057,937
- Assets
- $7,803,144
- Liabilities
- $6,319
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- DOROTHY FARRELL (EXECUTIVE DI): $137,669 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
As a public grantmaking charity serving the islands of sanibel and captiva, our mission is to inspire philanthropy, leadership and collaboration for the vitality of the island communnity.
What it reported doing in 2024
In the past year, the charitable foundation of the islands (cfi) expanded its impact by addressing urgent post-hurricane recovery needs while continuing to strengthen core programs in philanthropy, nonprofit capacity, and community leadership. A major highlight was the launch of an economic revitalization strategy to support local businesses, including a 100,000 grant to the sancap chamber that catalyzed 1.9 million in hospitality relief for island businesses. Cfi also established a board-led economic revitalization committee and developed the accelerate loan program, backed by 1.1 million in private capital from cfi board members. Simultaneously, the foundation deepened its work in nonprofit engagement-hosting monthly collaboration meetings, guiding capital campaigns, and launching a grant writing academy that served over 30 staff from 13 organizations. Cfi's leadership sanibel-captiva program completed its third year with high participant satisfaction and measurable alumni engagement in civic life. Donor support was sustained through enhanced stewardship efforts such as the francis bailey society and a donor recognition event. Improvements to donor-advised fund (daf) administration increased transparency and usability, and cfi secured 70,000 in new funding for eldercare initiatives, including its first field-of-interest fund. With increased communications outreach, strategic grantmaking, and continued involvement in civic and philanthropic leadership, cfi was honored as the 2024 organization of the year by the sanibel captiva chamber of commerce- recognition of its role as a vital convener and catalyst for community progress.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 78% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 71% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 74
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 88.6%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 77.1%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $29.03 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 90.4%; rating input score 90; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.2%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.38; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 19.8% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16.7% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 20.7% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 88.6% of revenue deployed · 77.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $815K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $138K · 18 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 18 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 16 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 28/100.