Center for Family Health - Malta
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 800869393
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014
- Location
- Dekalb, IL, USA
- Phone
- 8157561521
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospitals and Related Primary Medical Care Facilities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $526,121
- Expenses
- $477,449
- Assets
- $160,611
- Liabilities
- $43,328
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KEVIN POORTEN (PRESIDENT & CEO KISHHEALTH SYSTEM)
Highest reported compensation
- KEVIN POORTEN (PRESIDENT & CEO KISHHEALTH SYSTEM): $1,002,496 total reported compensation
- LOREN FOELSKE (VP FINANCE - KISHHEALTH SYSTEM): $416,557 total reported compensation
- ROGER HEATH BELL (VP AND CIO): $337,013 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide compassionate, innovative, and affordable medical care and to collaborate with partners to serve the health needs of our community.
What it reported doing in 2014
The kishhealth system center for family health malta was formally tri-county community health center. The center is primarily staffed by a physician assistant and nurse practitioners with part-time coverage from a family practice physician. Services provided at both the malta and sycamore locations are primary care for adults, children and infants, annual physicals (including pap smears and breast exams), well child exams, routine care for infants, sick care, immunizations, school and sports physicals, and include english and spanish bilingual staff. Center for family health, provides access to primary and same day care to a wide range of patients, including those on insurance, medicaid, and those who do not have health insurance. A sliding fee scale is used based on income. Since the clinic is part of kishwaukee college's campus, it provides convenient care to students and faculty in addition to serving the residents of the rural area around the college who have limited access to primary care without traveling.for fye 4/30/2015, the center for family health malta had 2,623 patient visits. Of these patients, 48% received medicaid assistance and 29% were self-pay/uninsured.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 32
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.5%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 98.6%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.3%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.34; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.27; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 78.4%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 21.8% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 104.5% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 37.9% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.5% of revenue deployed · 98.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 2 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $471K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1M · 11 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2013 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 13 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.