Valley West Community Hospital
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 364244337
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014
- Location
- Dekalb, IL, USA
- Phone
- 8157561521
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $49,491,630
- Expenses
- $45,412,372
- Assets
- $72,419,927
- Liabilities
- $10,038,584
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KEVIN POORTEN (PRESIDENT & CEO - KISHHEALTH SYSTEM)
- BRAD COPPLE (PRESIDENT - KH & VWH)
Highest reported compensation
- KEVIN POORTEN (PRESIDENT & CEO - KISHHEALTH SYSTEM): $1,002,496 total reported compensation
- DR MICHAEL KULISZ (CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER): $540,989 total reported compensation
- BRAD COPPLE (PRESIDENT - KH & VWH): $436,867 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide comprehensive health care services, including inpatient acute and nonacute care, and various outpatient services in the areas of dekalb, kendall, and lasalle counties. Valley west hospital will strive to provide high quality primary care and community health education, while promoting community health services in a friendly, caring environment. Valley west hospital is commited to providing health care in accordance with the highest medical and ethical standards with care, compassion, and respect for all, protecting the dignity, autonomy and integrity of all our patients, while managing the medical resources at our disposal with wisdom and fairness.
What it reported doing in 2014
Valley west hospital (valley west), located in sandwich, Illinois, serves the residents of southern dekalb, northern lasalle and western kendall counties by offering a number of programs and services that go beyond basic health care. Valley west believes that in order to be a true "community" hospital, we must be a resource for preventative and curative health information, education and services and that we must support the efforts of others who also are doing work for the community good. Doing so helps build trust, respect and loyalty for our hospital and strengthens our role as a partner in improving the health of our citizens and the quality of life in the communities we serve.the community benefit objectives of valley west include programs to improve access to health services by reducing geographic, financial, language and cultural barriers; improve and enhance public health, advance general health knowledge, and relieve the government burden of providing health services for the community, and for the uninsured and underinsured. Community health needs are identified and addressed through community outreach programs, by adding new services and by expanding others. Needs also are met through operational programs such as charity care, subsidized services and providing cash and in-kind donations to support organizations that also strive to meet community health and quality of life needs. The hospital identifies community health needs in several ways. Analyses were conducted at the most local level possible for valley west hospital's primary service area, given the availability of the data. Resources utilized include:* american diabetes association* american medical association* american university survey* centers for disease control and prevention* community needs index* Illinois department of employment security* Illinois department of public health* Illinois department of public health annual hospital questionnaire* Illinois department of public health, behavorial risk factors survey* Illinois department of public health, Illinois county cancer statistics review incidence* Illinois department of public health: birth defects and other adverse pregnancy outcomes in Illinois, 2004-2008* Illinois hospital association* Illinois hospital association, compdata* Illinois public health community map* national cancer institute* national center for health statistics* national heart lung and blood institute* northern Illinois university enrollment data* pioneering healthier communities* state of Illinois data by zip code* us census bureau 2010 data* internal review of outpatient and inpatient trends, especially emergency department usage * input from other community providers. This includes providing hospital leaders to serve on boards and committees that directly or indirectly impact community health or help the hospital connect to underserved or vulnerable populations.the hospital focused on the following community health needs in fy15: expand kish physician group (kpg) primary care providers in identified service areas.goal: provide greater access to care in the communities we serve, while utilizing the latest technology, equipment and education to provide the highest level of care.o during the course of the fiscal year, kish physician group expanded services to two additional locations including aurora and dekalb and thirty new providers. The addition of providers includes the acquisition of the dekalb clinic providers which took place on march 2, 2015. Throughout the fiscal year there was approximately a 70% increase in the number of patient visits. Support live healthy dekalb county (formerly pioneering healthier communities) in its policy and systems changes.goal: support the work of live healthy dekalb county through its policy and environmental changes to motivate people to eat healthy and be physically active every day.o during this last year valley west hospital has supported staff participation on the live healthy dekalb cou
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 91% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 68
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 66
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.9%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 82.5%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 98.6%; rating input score 99; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.2%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.59; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.2%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.9% of revenue deployed · 82.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 3 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $37.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1M · 17 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $9.1M reported
- Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 18 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.