Northwestern Medicine

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
363649080
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2014
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2014
Location
Dekalb, IL, USA
Phone
1-844-NMBETTER
Rating
56
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Health Systems

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$49,456,233
Expenses
$23,554,048
Assets
$61,924,064
Liabilities
$28,259,098

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

27 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KEVIN POORTEN (DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT & CEO - KISHHEALTH SYSTEM)
  • BRAD COPPLE (PRESIDENT - KH & VWH)

Highest reported compensation

  • KEVIN POORTEN (DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT & CEO - KISHHEALTH SYSTEM): $1,002,496 total reported compensation
  • DR MICHAEL KULISZ (CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER): $540,989 total reported compensation
  • BRAD COPPLE (PRESIDENT - KH & VWH): $436,867 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide high-quality, compassionate healthcare services to the communities we serve.

What it reported doing in 2014

Kishhealth system (khs) is the non-profit corporate umbrella for two hospitals, a hospice, clinic, home health care service, and a health foundation predominately serving residents of dekalb, kendall and lasalle counties in Illinois. The mission of the health system is to be "the cornerstone of health care for the communities we serve-the first choice for service, comfort and safety. As a community-owned health system, the kish family unselfishly commits to excellence, education and innovation." in addition to the community benefits provided by kishwaukee community hospital, valley west community hospital, dekalb county hospice, center for family health clinic, kishhealth home care, and kishhealth foundation, the health system's corporate office provides community benefit in the following areas:* kish health system underwrote $6,775,000 for kish health system physician group, $251,000 for kishhealth system center for family health-malta, $238,000 for kishhealth system homecare, and $304,000 for kishhealth system hospice (dekalb county hospice) for operational losses in fiscal year 2015, all vital services for the health of the community. In addition to contributions made by kishwaukee hospital and valley west hospital to other organizations within their communities, kish health system contributed in excess of $4,500 to other organizations within the community.kishhealth system employees contributed 772 hours of in-kind service to community organizations, educational institutions and other activities that promote health and education. Kish health system leaders serve on the boards of directors for live healthy dekalb county, formerly known as pioneering healthy communities, kishwaukee family ymca, kishwaukee college foundation, opportunity house, voluntary action center, dekalb county youth services board, dekalb county economic development corporation; dekalb, sycamore, genoa, sandwich, and plano chambers of commerce; the center for family health, fox valley older adult services, northern Illinois university, wabaunsee community college, and st. Anthony school of nursing advisory boards.the health system's non-profit entities are kishwaukee hospital, a 98-bed hospital in dekalb, il, serving all of dekalb county and beyond, valley west hospital, a 25-bed critical access hospital in sandwich; kish health system hospice, dekalb, il, which provides free care and support for the terminally ill as well as grief support to the public; center for family health malta, il, primary care clinic for medicaid and uninsured; kish health system physician group, which provides access to medical services, especially the rural areas and accepts medicaid and uninsured patients, kish health system homecare, dekalb, il, which provides home health services previously offered through the county health department, and kish health foundation in dekalb, il, which raises money for the health system and funds equipment purchases and patient services particularly in the area of cancer care for those who cannot afford.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 83% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most filed governance safeguards are in place. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 9
  • Transparency & Controls: 93
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 7.1%; rating input score 7
  • Program expense ratio: 15%; rating input score 15
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.3%; rating input score 99; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 69.2%; rating input score 69; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 52.4%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.63; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.46; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 21%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 68.9% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 37.7% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 33.8% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site
  • Where the money goes: 7.1% of revenue deployed · 15% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 13 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1M · 27 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2M reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2011 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 21 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 14 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 7/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 15/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.