Advanced Medical Transport Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
260312211
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Peoria, IL, USA
Phone
3094946200
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Ambulance, Emergency Medical Transport Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,000
Expenses
$2,977
Assets
$7,460
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANDREW RAND (BOARD MEMBER/CEO OF PHMMS)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANDREW RAND (BOARD MEMBER/CEO OF PHMMS): $528,193 total reported compensation
  • TIM BECCUE (VP OF FINANCE OF PHMMS): $321,432 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Advanced medical transport is organized and operated exclusively for charitable, scientific, and educational purposes in furtherance of, and to carry out, the purposes of peoria hospitals mobile medical services, an Illinois not for profit corporation, advanced medical transport of springfield, an Illinois not for profit corporation, and advanced medical transport of Iowa, an Iowa not for profit corporation. The organization is organized exclusively for charitable, scientific, and educational purposes.

What it reported doing in 2025

The organization provides emergency ambulance care, treatment and transportation to multiple jurisdictions in Illinois. In addition to emergency ambulance service, the entity provides scheduled ambulance, behavioral health (ipt) and wheelchair transportation between hospitals and other healthcare facilities. The organization provided 69,669 ambulance, 5,170 ipt and 6,694 wheelchair transports in 2025. The organization provided $3,374,299 in charitable services to qualified individuals at no charge or at amounts less than established rates. The organization also provided care to medicare and medicaid patients at rates below the cost of providing services. For 2025 payments were less than estimated costs by $6,734,953. The organization also provided $741,037 in support of other community benefits.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 64
  • Accountability: 81
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 99.2%; rating input score 99
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.8%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.51; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2,442.3%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 26.2% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16.9% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 99.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 12 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $528K · 13 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 12 of 12 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.