Advanced Medical Transport East Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
862146583
IRS 990 coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Peoria, IL, USA
Phone
3094946200
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Ambulance, Emergency Medical Transport Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$7,734,860
Expenses
$9,343,456
Assets
$2,520,310
Liabilities
$3,903,129

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARY LOVEJOY (BOARD PRESIDENT)
  • SARAH DEE GEIGER (BOARD VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ANDREW RAND (BOARD MEMBER/CEO OF PHMMS)
  • GREG CHANCE (BOARD MEMBER/CEO AMTSI/CEO AMTE)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANDREW RAND (BOARD MEMBER/CEO OF PHMMS): $528,193 total reported compensation
  • TIM BECCUE (VP FINANCE OF PHMMS): $321,432 total reported compensation
  • GREG CHANCE (BOARD MEMBER/CEO AMTSI/CEO AMTE): $310,006 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization provides emergency ambulance care, treatment and transportation. In addition, the organization provides scheduled ambulance transportation between hospitals and other healthcare facilities. The organization is organized exclusively for charitable, scientific, and educational purposes.

What it reported doing in 2025

The organization provides ambulance transportation services including 10,285 ambulance transports in 2025. The organization provided $947,502 in charitable services to qualified individuals at no charge or at amounts less than established rates. The organization also provided care to medicare and medicaid patients at rates below the cost of providing services. For 2025 payments were less than estimated costs by $3,083,797. The organization also provided $13,528 in support of other community benefits.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The program-spending lines do not add up, so the filing cannot show reliably whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 68
  • Accountability: 78
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 82.7%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 95.8%; rating input score 96; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 77.8%; rating input score 78; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -20.8%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.55; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.1%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 25.8% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 18.3% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 82.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $528K · 15 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $285K reported
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.