Advanced Medical Transport
Legal name: Peoria Hospitals Mobile Medical Services D/b/a Adv Medical Trans of Central Il
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 370999878
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025
- Location
- Peoria, IL, US
- Phone
- (800) 457-1143
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ambulance, Emergency Medical Transport Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $46,118,806
- Expenses
- $35,112,182
- Assets
- $68,037,900
- Liabilities
- $5,730,369
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANDREW RAND (CEO/BOARD MEMBER)
Highest reported compensation
- ANDREW RAND (CEO/BOARD MEMBER): $528,193 total reported compensation
- TODD BAKER (VP OF BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT): $344,901 total reported compensation
- TIM BECCUE (VP OF FINANCE): $321,432 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our comprehensive team of healthcare professionals combine outstanding healthcare transportation with pre-hospital medical care that can make a profound difference for the people and communities we serve.
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization provides emergency ambulance care, treatment and transportation to multiple jurisdictions in Illinois. In addition, the entity provides scheduled ambulance, behavioral health (ipt) and wheelchair transportation between hospitals and other healthcare facilities. The organization provided 49,560 ambulance, 5,170 ipt and 6,694 wheelchair transports in 2025. The organization provided $2,027,953 in charitable services to qualified individuals at no charge or at amounts less than established rates. The organization also provided care to medicare and medicaid patients at rates below the cost of providing services. For 2025 payments were less than estimated costs by $2,904,261. The organization also provided $702,921 in support of other community benefits.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The program-spending lines do not add up, so the filing cannot show reliably whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 59
- Transparency & Controls: 66
- Accountability: 87
- Sustainability: 65
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 58.2%; rating input score 58
- Program expense ratio: 79.8%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: 88.4%; rating input score 88; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 23.9%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.94; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.4%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 6 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 58.2% of revenue deployed · 79.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $28M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $528K · 17 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $3.8M reported
- Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 25 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 17 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.