Westshore Health Network Dba Affina Health Network - Lakeshore
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 383280200
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018
- Location
- Kentwood, MI, USA
- Phone
- 2317393882
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Community Health Systems
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $0
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PAUL CHOVAZ MD (TRUSTEE; PRESIDENT; ASSOC MED DIR)
- SHAUN RALEIGH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- ROGER SPOELMAN (TRUSTEE,CHAIR, TRINITY SVP THR 12/18): $1,154,276 total reported compensation
- GARY ALLORE (TRUSTEE; PRES MERCY HEALTH MUSKEGON): $615,648 total reported compensation
- MARY BOYD (TRUSTEE; CIO-MICHIGAN REGION): $602,520 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We, mercy health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. Westshore health network is a member of mercy health and trinity health.
What it reported doing in 2018
Westshore health network contracts on behalf of its physician, hospital and ancillary providers with local, statewide and federal payers to provide network access and payment for medical care services delivered to individuals within our community. We work collaboratively with payers, providers and employees to organize education programs for area health care providers, educate local employers regarding efficient and affordable health care, and participate with other area organizations in health education and clinical integration initiatives. More specifically, the following provider services are available to all network members: education on payer contracts, claims resolution, clinical education including cme/ceu, provider-to-provider networking, credentialing, physician access, outreach, recruitment, support of health information exchange and portal use for coordination of care and enhanced provider communication, and comprehensive reporting strategy for utilization, risk, quality and incentives. We support process improvement of clinical integration models, including the chronic care model to improve care of chronic disease, and patient centered medical home models of multi-disciplinary teams for primary care delivery. We also offer the following information technology support: population health management, data analysis and report generation, payer registry support services, and analysis of fee schedules.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 53
- Accountability: 47
- Sustainability: NotEnoughData
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 40%; rating input score 40; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: -23.6% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -24.5% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -28.4% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 4 of 10 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.2M · 13 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 8 of 10 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2013 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 320 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 40/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Series filing activity did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.