Wesley Glen Health Services Corp
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 311614458
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Columbus, OH, USA
- Phone
- 6148887492
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Supportive Housing for Older Adults
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,026,776
- Expenses
- $435,878
- Assets
- $3,434,326
- Liabilities
- $10,159,273
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SCOTT MCQUINN (CEO/PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- SCOTT MCQUINN (CEO/PRESIDENT): $1,114,255 total reported compensation
- JAMES BOWERSOX (COO/SECRETARY): $804,190 total reported compensation
- KEVIN MCDONNELL (CFO/TREASURER): $560,981 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We work for the day when everyone involved in senior living finds fulfillment through: (a) life with meaning and purpose; (b) enriching opportunities and experiences; (c) communities fostering relationship and perpetuating legacy. Mission: we provide exceptional everyday experiences in a christian community by: (a) creating associate experiences that support, engage and empower delivering resident and customer experiences that exceed expectations; (b) setting and surpassing standards for quality and safety; (c) growing consistently in service and value; (d) producing expanded resources to extend our impact. Values: we are an extended family of multiple generations, bound together with: (a) respect: honoring the dignity of all people; (b) innovation: igniting entrepreneurial initiative and creative solutions; (c) spirituality: pursuing our purpose consistent with christian principles; (d) excellence: striving for extraordinary effectiveness and efficiency.
What it reported doing in 2024
To provide facilites for healthcare services to the elderly.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 57
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 83
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 41.9%; rating input score 42
- Program expense ratio: 99.8%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 57.5%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.88; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.96; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 168.2%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -12.1% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -6.2% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 41.9% of revenue deployed · 99.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 14 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $435K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.1M · 16 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 14 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.