Vermont Association for the Education of Young Children
Legal name: Vt Association for the Education of Young Children
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 030313379
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Montpelier, VT, US
- Phone
- (802) 234-1090
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Elementary, Secondary Education, K - 12
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $7,138,964
- Expenses
- $6,751,592
- Assets
- $1,328,330
- Liabilities
- $792,867
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MEGHAN MESZKAT (PRESIDENT EL)
Highest reported compensation
- SHARRON HARRINGTON (EXECUTIVE DI): $103,296 total reported compensation
- AMBER BOLLMAN (DIRECTOR): $6,000 total reported compensation
- KIM FREEMAN (DIRECTOR): $2,090 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To advance equity and excellence in early childhood education with early childhood educators as our foundation.
What it reported doing in 2024
Advocacy - vtaeyc elevated the voices of early childhood educators by communicating feedback received or facilitating the early childhood educator's testimony to appropriate stakeholders. Vtaeyc offered monthly "roundtable" discussions to receive feedback from early childhood educators and stakeholders statewide regarding updates to the legislation, career supports for early childhood educators looking ahead to qualify for licensure, the unifying framework for the early childhood profession, and why recognition of the profession matters. Vtaeyc also elevated early childhood educator's voices by obtaining feedback during administration of its programs and providing this information on resources needed for, and barriers to, high-quality early childhood education to funders and program managers which has resulted in new funding opportunities, changes to programs, and changes to policy. Vtaeyc provided leadership and advocacy development with philanthropic grants by implementing the 9-month vtaeyc exchange fellowship program. This fellowship program focused on "advocacy through action" through the lens of four intersections: early childhood education and community, equity, creative arts and planet. Eight fellows completed the program, including completing capstone projects and serving as table facilitator at Vermont's early childhood day at the legislature. Vtaeyc advocated to advance the vision in the unifying framework for the early childhood profession by collaborating/coordinating with advocates and stakeholders engaging with and responding to the state (vt) office of professional regulation sunrise review for ece to become a regulated profession; and providing expert testimony to the Vermont senate government operations committee, the senate committee on finance, and the senate appropriations committee during the 2025 legislative session. Vtaeyc offered monthly "roundtable" discussions to inform early childhood educators and stakeholders statewide of updates to the legislation, career supports for early childhood educators looking ahead to qualify for licensure, and to provide background information on the unifying framework and why recognition of the profession matters. Vtaeyc provided weekly updates to the members of the Vermont early childhood advocacy alliance and biweekly updates to the let's grow kids policy advisory work group throughout the legislative session.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 92% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 44% for direct work, and 56% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 90
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 91.9%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: $2,977.31 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 77.3%; rating input score 77; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.4%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.2; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.6; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.7%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 48.3% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 51% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 37.2% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 87% of revenue deployed · 91.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $6.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $103K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 56 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 49 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.