VNA Health Group
Legal name: Visiting Nurse Association Health Group Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 222500029
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Holmdel, NJ, US
- Phone
- 800-862-3330
- Rating
- 52
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $46,170,209
- Expenses
- $42,728,191
- Assets
- $52,510,667
- Liabilities
- $21,752,058
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
45 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRISTOPHER RINN (PRESIDENT/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- CHRISTOPHER RINN (PRESIDENT/CEO): $885,802 total reported compensation
- PETER GAYLORD MBA (ASST TREASURER/CFO/COO(TERMED)): $587,685 total reported compensation
- JOHN CHIAPPINELLI ESQ (ASST SEC/GENERAL COUNSEL): $446,797 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Empowering individuals and families to live their best lives.
What it reported doing in 2024
VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION HEALTH GROUP, INC. PROVIDES MANAGEMENT, ADMINISTRATIVE AND SUPPORT SERVICES TO ITS AFFILIATED ORGANIZATIONS. THE AFFILIATED ORGANIZATIONS PROVIDE A FULL CONTINUUM OF COMMUNITY-BASED SERVICES TO PATIENTS IN THEIR HOMES AND OTHER SETTINGS THROUGH THEIR HOME CARE AND HOSPICE PROGRAMS UTILIZING A MULTI-DISCIPLINARY TEAM OF CAREGIVERS. THE ORGANIZATION AND ITS AFFILIATES REMAIN DEDICATED TO HELPING INDIVIDUALS AND FAMILIES IN ACHIEVING THEIR BEST LEVEL OF WELL-BEING AND PROVIDED MULTIPLE PROGRAMS TO UNINSURED, UNDERINSURED AND DISENFRANCHISED PATIENTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN THE COMMUNITIES SERVED. DURING 2024, APPROXIMATELY 753,000 VISITS WERE PROVIDED TO OVER 39,000 INDIVIDUALS WHO RECEIVED HOME HEALTH CARE, HOSPICE SERVICES, AND OTHER HEALTHCARE SERVICES FROM ITS AFFILIATED ENTITIES. Our innovative, programmatic Institutes focus on three critical cores of VNA Health Group: health of children and their families; coordination of care enhanced by technology; and care for patients with serious, chronic and end-stage illness. Each institute has an expert thought leader and is providing enhanced access, care and services for patients, their families and our communities. Our Advanced Care Institute helps patients with late-stage, chronic illnesses stay at home comfortably with support from family, a visiting physician, and A palliative care team. Our goal is to educate clinicians, communities, patients and their families on best practices in chronic disease and palliative and hospice care. Within the Children and Family Health Institute are three centers focused on helping children and families achieve their highest level of health from pre-natal to adult: the Center for Early Childhood Development and Family Support; the Center for Primary Care and Public Health; and the Center for Pediatric Home Care. The Connected Health Institute spearheads mobile and digital initiatives to improve patient outcomes. With more than 1,500 clinicians, VNA Health Group and its affiliates have the unique opportunity to become a nationally recognized leader in researching, developing, and testing technologies that improve patient care. SIGNIFICANT changes are underway in health care including a dramatic increase in the older adult population, a national movement to contain health costs and expansion in mobile and digital health technologies. VNA Health Group is taking bold steps to reimagine how IT can address these challenges, secure ITS future and improve care for PATIENTS, including the most frail and vulnerable. Our unique organizational structure features Joint Venture Partnerships with RWJBarnabas Health, Englewood Hospital and Medical Center, Cleveland Clinic for Home Health, Hospice and Palliative Care Services, Parker Home and Community Based Services, and the MetroHealth System as well as acquisitions of organizations aligned with VNA's mission.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 88% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 89
- Accountability: 98
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
- Fundraising efficiency: $0.92 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 97.3%; rating input score 97; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.5%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.23; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.41; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.9%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 36 of 37 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $886K · 45 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.3M reported
- Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 20 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.