Robert Wood Johnson Visiting Nurses Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 263659270
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- North Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 7322246868
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Home Health Care
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $28,645,443
- Expenses
- $27,529,284
- Assets
- $15,539,793
- Liabilities
- $3,877,226
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ELLEN M GUSICK RN BSN (PRESIDENT HOME HEALTH & CNO)
Highest reported compensation
- LLOYD SAMKENI OSUNGA (STAFF NURSE): $166,810 total reported compensation
- JENNIFER L JONES (STAFF NURSE): $153,569 total reported compensation
- LERA T RAMGOBIN (DIR. CODING, OASIS REV): $148,744 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Robert wood johnson visiting nurses, inc. Is a nonprofit organization dedicated to helping individuals and families in achieving their best level of well-being by providing compassionate, coordinated, and innovative care in their homes and communities.
What it reported doing in 2024
THE VNA HEALTH GROUP AND ITS AFFILIATES, INCLUDING ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON VISITING NURSES, PROVIDED HOME HEALTH, HOSPICE AND COMMUNITY BASED SERVICES TO THE PEOPLE IN ITS SERVICE AREA. DURING 2024, APPROXIMATELY 753,000 VISITS WERE PROVIDED TO OVER 39,000 INDIVIDUALS WHO RECEIVED HOME HEALTH CARE, HOSPICE, AND OTHER HEALTHCARE SERVICES FROM THE ORGANIZATION AND ITS AFFILIATED ENTITIES. Our innovative, programmatic Institutes focus on three critical cores of VNA Health Group: health of children and their families; coordination of care enhanced by technology; and care for patients with serious, chronic and end-stage illness. Each institute has an expert thought leader and is providing enhanced access, care and services for patients, their families and our communities. Our Advanced Care Institute helps patients with late-stage, chronic illnesses stay at home comfortably with support from family, a visiting physician, and A palliative care team. Our goal is to educate clinicians, communities, patients and their families on best practices in chronic disease and palliative and hospice care. Within the Children and Family Health Institute are three centers focused on helping children and families achieve their highest level of health from pre-natal to adult: the Center for Early Childhood Development and Family Support; the Center for Primary Care and Public Health; and the Center for Pediatric Home Care. The Connected Health Institute spearheads mobile and digital initiatives to improve patient outcomes. With more than 1,500 clinicians, VNA Health Group and its affiliates have the unique opportunity to become a nationally recognized leader in researching, developing, and testing technologies that improve patient care. SIGNIFICANT changes are underway in health care including a dramatic increase in the older adult population, a national movement to contain health costs and expansion in mobile and digital health technologies. VNA Health Group is taking bold steps to reimagine how IT can address these challenges, secure ITS future and improve care for all patients, including the most frail and vulnerable. Our unique organizational structure features Joint Venture Partnerships with RWJ Barnabas Health for Home Health, Hospice and Palliative Care Services as well as acquisitions of organizations aligned with VNA's mission.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 62
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 42
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68.9%; rating input score 69
- Program expense ratio: 71.7%; rating input score 72
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.9%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.56; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.25; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.7%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 68.9% of revenue deployed · 71.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $19.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $167K · 13 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $5.6M reported
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 18 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.