UW Credit Union

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
390671465
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Madison, WI, US
Phone
608-232-5000
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Credit Unions

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$363,773,520
Expenses
$331,784,943
Assets
$5,653,143,610
Liabilities
$5,150,209,861

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

23 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PAUL KUNDERT (PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • PAUL KUNDERT (PRESIDENT & CEO): $1,473,595 total reported compensation
  • ROB VAN NEVEL (EVP & COO): $571,881 total reported compensation
  • BRAD MCCLAIN (EVP & CFO): $563,442 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the university of Wisconsin credit union (uwcu) is to encourage thrift among its members, to create a source of credit at a fair and reasonable rate of interest, to provide an opportunity for its members to improve their economic and social conditions and to perform the functions and exercise the powers designated to the credit union under applicable law.

What it reported doing in 2024

Uwcu continues to focus on delivering financial services in a trustworthy manner. Uwcu continues to provide credit consultation services, a free service that benefits any member. Members can meet with a financial specialist to review their credit report, gain knowledge about their credit score, and research options to lower rates on existing loans. Uwcu offers a student loan refinance product which allows members to refi multiple loans into one with a low rate and one easy payment. Uwcu offers low-limit, low rate credit cards for young adults to help them build their credit responsibly, and affordable no annual fee secured credit cards for members needing to repair their credit. Uwcu offers an overdraft line of credit protection with no annual fee. Members have access to their credit score via web branch. Uwcu offered 235 financial literacy sessions on college campuses, reaching almost 20,000 participants.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 86% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 69
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 68
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 98.4%; rating input score 98; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.8%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 17.04; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.91; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.1%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 50% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 13 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.5M · 23 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $4.9M reported
  • Consistency: 13 of 14 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 31 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 10 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 54/100.