University of Louisville Research Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
611029626
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Louisville, KY, United States
Phone
502-852-5555
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Research Institutes and/or Public Policy Analysis

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$659,270,973
Expenses
$701,636,925
Assets
$914,797,601
Liabilities
$694,459,248

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

25 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • C Aaron LeMay (Vice President from 3/1/25)
  • Charles Perusse (Vice President to 2/28/25)
  • Dr Kim Schatzel (President to 3/26/25)
  • Jon B Klein MD PhD (Vice President from 2/13/24)
  • Daniel A Durbin (Former Vice President)
  • Dr Beth Boehm (Former Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Dr Kim Schatzel (President to 3/26/25): $1,247,194 total reported compensation
  • Dr Thomas Gerard Bradley (Vice Pres to Pres eff 3/27/25): $718,623 total reported compensation
  • Daniel A Durbin (Former Vice President): $587,572 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The University of Louisville Research Foundation (ULRF), Inc. is organized for charitable, educational, and scientific purposes, including carrying out and supporting projects relating to the educational, scientific, literary, artistic, health care, and public service missions of the University of Louisville.

What it reported doing in 2024

The University of Louisville Research Foundation (ULRF) continued its mission of conducting groundbreaking research in the 2024-2025 fiscal year, securing over $170 million to drive innovation and address critical societal challenges. This significant investment, comprising 857 separate awards, fuels essential research across key areas, including health, workforce development, engineering, and climate resilience. Federal agencies recognized ULRF's leadership with $91 million in direct funding, complemented by $27.2 million in federal flowthrough. Robust support from the Commonwealth of Kentucky ($32 million), industry partners ($12 million), and non-profits ($6.7 million) further underscores the diverse collaborations fueling ULRF's research engine. Transforming Clinical Care: A landmark $11.7 million grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is powering the launch of the Louisville Clinical and Translational Research Center (LCTRC). This statewide initiative is designed to transform the University's clinical research infrastructure, accelerating the transition of laboratory findings into meaningful medical solutions for chronic conditions-such as heart disease, stroke, and cancer-that disproportionately affect both urban and rural Kentuckians. Advancing Industrial Innovation and Decarbonization: Demonstrating a commitment to sustainable engineering, UofL's Additive Manufacturing Institute for Science and Technology secured $1.57 million from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). This project focuses on decarbonizing industrial aluminum processing through the development of additive-manufactured electrical furnaces, positioning the University at the forefront of green manufacturing technology. Strengthening State Infrastructure and Education: ULRF is actively engaged in improving the Commonwealth's future through several key initiatives. This includes the establishment of the Statewide Reading and Research Center (Kentucky Department of Education) and a comprehensive Research and Development Work Program with the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC) for the 2025-2026 period, ensuring data-driven improvements to state literacy and infrastructure. Leading Climate Resilience and Environmental Stewardship: Through the CLIMBS project (supported by the NSF), ULRF is leveraging multidisciplinary big data to build prediction and response systems for climate resilience. Additionally, the University is leading the design and monitoring of the Harrison Fork (Bernheim Forest) Watershed Project, protecting vital natural resources in Nelson County, KY. Additional Notable Awards: The fiscal year also saw significant funding for the Healthcare Workforce Investment Fund Partnership (KYHEAA) to bolster the medical talent pipeline, and continued investment in high-impact research across the social and physical sciences. These accomplishments underscore the University of Louisville Research Foundation's commitment to impactful research that advances knowledge, improves lives, and strengthens our community, the Commonwealth, and the nation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 73% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Accountability: 77
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 97.9%; rating input score 98
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.9%; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 76.9%; rating input score 77; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -6.4%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.3; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.76; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.1%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 20.1% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 97.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $687.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.2M · 25 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $16.2M reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.