UofL Health – UofL Hospital

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
611293786
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Louisville, KY, USA
Phone
502-562-3000
Rating
71
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospital, General

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,071,307,710
Expenses
$937,609,362
Assets
$1,062,047,011
Liabilities
$448,078,273

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

32 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • THOMAS D MILLER (CEO, UOFL HEALTH/SEC./TREASURER)

Highest reported compensation

  • THOMAS D MILLER (CEO, UOFL HEALTH/SEC./TREASURER): $1,506,278 total reported compensation
  • JASON CHESNEY MD (DIRECTOR/IMMUNO-ONCOLOGIST (BCC)/UOFL PROFESSOR): $1,417,668 total reported compensation
  • KELLY MCMASTERS MD PHD (DIRECTOR/SURGEON (BCC)/UOFL PROFESSOR): $1,098,546 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide care to our community and to serve as a major teaching hospital for education and training in medicine, dentistry, nursing, and allied health professions.

What it reported doing in 2024

University medical center operates the university of louisville hospital and brown cancer center. Uofl health - uofl hospital, an academic teaching and research hospital with 404 licensed beds, is at the heart of the louisville metro area in downtown louisville. Uofl hospital offers a second-to-none cancer center, world-renowned trauma team and a uniquely streamlined, nationally accredited stroke center - the latest innovations in a history of world-class care. Uofl hospital is the only adult level i trauma center in the region. The trauma center admits more than 3,000 patients each year, including 1,500 patients a year who live outside jefferson county and its surrounding counties, making it a resource not only for louisville residents but also for people throughout kentuckiana. Included within the trauma care provided at uofl hospital is the only dedicated burn center in Kentucky. Within uofl hospital, uofl health brown cancer center features multidisciplinary teams specializing in treating cancers of the blood and bone marrow, breast, head and neck, lungs, and skin, as well as the central nervous system (brain and spine), gastrointestinal, genitourinary and reproductive systems. Key service lines include: 24/7 emergency care and level i trauma center, academic medical center, brown cancer center, burn center, comprehensive stroke center, high-risk obstetrics services, robotic surgical care, including ear, nose and throat, gynecologic and surgical oncology, urology and urogynecology, general and colorectal surgery. Uofl health brown cancer center is an academic cancer center affiliated with the uofl school of medicine. The cancer center's goal is to make cancer a disease of the past through cutting-edge care, innovative clinical trials and cancer prevention efforts. Brown cancer center is home to Kentucky's first and longest-accredited program by the national accreditation program for breast centers. We are a nationally recognized center for developing experimental cancer therapeutics and diagnostics and have the most significant cancer trials program in the region. We are a global leader in the clinical trial testing of new immunotherapies that activate your body's immune system to fight cancer and have become early adopters of these immunotherapies that reduce the cancer death rate in the u.s. The center for cancer immunology and immunotherapy has been established through experts at the brown cancer center to understand further the role of cancer and the immune system to identify new therapeutic targets and develop innovative treatment strategies. Key service lines include multidisciplinary teams specializing in the treatment of: blood and bone marrow cancers, breast cancer, head and neck cancers, lung cancer, melanoma and other skin cancers, brain and spine cancers, gastrointestinal cancer, genitourinary cancer, gynecologic cancers, sarcoma, benign tumors and conditions.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some related-organization disclosures are missing.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 84
  • Accountability: 42
  • Sustainability: 64
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77.5%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 88.2%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 9.1%; rating input score 9; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 12.5%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.13; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.42; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.9%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 3 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 77.5% of revenue deployed · 88.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 1 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $827M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.5M · 32 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $6.6M reported
  • Consistency: 36 of 37 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 30 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 11 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 9/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.