United Way of the Plains Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 480547688
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Wichita, KS, USA
- Phone
- 3162671321
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Federated Giving Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $17,231,185
- Expenses
- $15,335,208
- Assets
- $23,360,094
- Liabilities
- $3,907,882
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
36 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PETER NAJERA (BOARD SECRETARY/PRESIDENT/CEO)
- ABEL FREDERIC JR (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- PETER NAJERA (BOARD SECRETARY/PRESIDENT/CEO): $454,470 total reported compensation
- DARREN MINKS (CFO): $188,317 total reported compensation
- ABEL FREDERIC JR (VICE PRESIDENT): $148,988 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To improve lives by harnessing the caring power of our community to advance the common good in south central Kansas.
What it reported doing in 2024
Community impact and grants administered: united way's lead role in community grants resulted in grant revenues in excess of $4.8 million for the local community, of which $2.0 million was directly administered by united way of the plains. Grants awarded were primarily in the areas of education, financial stability, health, and homelessness. Education initiatives: continued the read-to-succeed program which partnered with area elementary schools, by providing reading coaches dedicated to reading with children. Reading coaches devoted 30 minutes once a week with a student to help develop reading skills. As a result, 437 second & third grade children enrolled in this program benefited from this mentoring program. Health initiatives: prescription medicines: through a partnership with singlecare - provided a discounted prescription drug plan, saving area residents over $180,000 on prescripton costs. Dental care: through a partnership with delta dental of Kansas, provided dental insurance coverage througout the state of Kansas for working individuals that are not able to afford traditional dental insurance. Through this program, 416 clients received over $430,000 in dental care benefits during 2024. Financial stability initiatives: through our volunteer income tax assistance program, over 120 volunteers were recruited, trained and provided assistance in filing over 11,000 tax returns for the elderly and low-income residents resulting in over $7.3 million dollars being returned to these individuals. Basic needs initiatives: homeless initiatives: united way serves as the lead agency for the coalition to end homelessness in wichita/sedgwick county, which is comprised of over 600 individuals and organizations from nonprofit, faith-based, government, and business organizations, and individual community advocates. This coalition colloaborates on the planning of the services needed for homeless individuals and families in our community. During 2024, this committee served over 3,200 individuals by providing assistance with emergency shelter, transitional housing, and street outreach and housing services. With over 1,400 individuals being housed or kept in housing during the year. Disaster response and assistance: during 2024, united way continued its role in providing assistance to victims of an april 2022 tornado. Through the relief fund established to assist victims of this disaster, united way distributed over $500,000 in relief funds to residents impacted by this disaster. The individual applications for assistance are reviewed by a long-term recovery committee, established by the city of andover, with united way having a seat on the committee
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 78% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75.8%; rating input score 76
- Program expense ratio: 83.2%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $15.12 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 96.3%; rating input score 96; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.52; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.2%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 75.8% of revenue deployed · 83.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 30 of 30 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $12.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $454K · 36 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 45 of 46 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 165 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 129 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 50/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 49/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.