United Way of Lake County Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
341105038
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Mentor, OH, USA
Phone
4403523166
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Federated Giving Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,736,711
Expenses
$1,882,295
Assets
$4,574,870
Liabilities
$945,675

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

22 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DIONE DEMITRO (CEO AND PRES)

Highest reported compensation

  • DIONE DEMITRO (CEO AND PRES): $115,897 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

United way of lake county, along with its mission to "measurably improve the quality of people's lives in lake county", provides the most effective channel through which the community may participate in a voluntary, cooperative effort to identify, evaluate, support and fund current human service needs in lake county. United way of lake county is a local, independent nonprofit organization that funds programs in the three building blocks to a better community; education, financial stability, and health, along with basic needs. United way of lake county affects two out of every three residents while striving to make a measurable impact on all residents in the community. United way of lake county's vision is to become the entrusted champion that drives improved outcomes in our community by funding services that impact education, income (financial stability) and health.

What it reported doing in 2024

Community impact includes coordination of agency staff, volunteers, and other resources to conduct activities for the betterment of the community. Our annual day of caring was held in june where lake county companies, organizations, and individuals adopted projects submitted by lake county agencies, and we helped to pair hundreds of volunteers with the projects. These efforts help to save our non-profit partners tens of thousands of dollars in labor and supplies. During the grant allocation process in the spring, we ran our annual feed lake county drive through a solicitation mailing and 100+ companies and organizations ran food and monetary drives. Because of the support of so many companies and individuals, we were able to host several food distributions all throughout the year, totaling nearly 43,000 in direct food purchases, on top of distributing tens of thousands of pounds donated by area companies and individuals. We also moved to being an on-site year-round pantry where our partner pantries can obtain the food their specific pantry needs. The hunger coalition was also formed to keep partner pantries and other agencies dealing with food insecurity informed of needs, best practices, collaboration efforts, etc. We also have two affinity groups that were able to thrive throughout the year. The emerging leaders (el) are made up of a group of lake county young professionals that host an annual golf outing, 4 under 40 awards ceremony, and other fundraising/network events throughout the year. Because of their efforts, they were able to allocate tens of thousands of dollars to programs related to their youth-driven mission, including 10,000 directly to the youth united way program for high school students. Women united comprises lake county women whose mission is to improve the lives of women and children in lake county. They were able to host some of their regular events throughout the year, including a speaker series, and their signature winterfest event was held in november, where the in-person donations and online raffle proceeds helped to make this a record-breaking winterfest. Dollars raised from wu fundraising efforts are allocated to programs that support at-risk women and children in lake county, and share the same process as the el group. Because of their efforts, women united was able to allocate over 111,000 to mission-driven programs. Under the leadership of dione demitro, uwlc continued to be more visible in the lake county community and involved in several community projects, initiatives, and partnerships. We have partnered on herofest, an event to raise funds for first responders, have grown our role in the annual back to school bash where over 1,500 children get supplies and clothing to be school- ready, coordinated the severe winter weather overnight program (code blue), and collaborated to help fill emergency needs with the continuation of our responsive fund grants process with over 28,000 of direct funding.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 67% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.7%; rating input score 91
  • Program expense ratio: 83.3%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7.33 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 98.6%; rating input score 99; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -8.4%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.43; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.21; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.2%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.9% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.6% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90.7% of revenue deployed · 83.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $116K · 22 people listed
  • Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 23 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 20 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 28/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 50/100.