United Way of Chester County Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232131877
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Exton, PA, USA
Phone
6104299400
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Federated Giving Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,951,170
Expenses
$1,806,330
Assets
$2,926,408
Liabilities
$700,927

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

26 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHRISTOPHER SAELLO (PRESIDENT/CE)

Highest reported compensation

  • CHRISTOPHER SAELLO (PRESIDENT/CE): $193,132 total reported compensation
  • STEPHANIE MILLER (COO): $122,585 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To unite people and mobilize resources to build better lives and stronger communities.

What it reported doing in 2024

Chester county united way's agency relations and community development team is dedicated to making a meaningful difference in the lives of chester county residents. By building and nurturing partnerships with local nonprofits, the team ensures that vital resources and services reach those who need them most. Our strategic approach focuses on wise fund allocation, capacity building, and innovative community initiatives that create a lasting, positive impact. We are committed to addressing the most pressing challenges and working collaboratively to foster a thriving, resilient community for all. Impact highlights from the last fiscal year: -the total number of chester county residents assisted was 132,177. - invested 1,600,000: through a combination of grants to 35 agencies, special initiative funding, and donor designations, we strategically invested 1.6 million directly into the chester county community. This funding has supported essential programs and services, enhancing the capacity of our nonprofit partners and creating new opportunities for residents. - prepared 3,677 tax returns: our volunteer income tax assistance (vita) program, a cornerstone of our financial stability efforts, helped residents prepare 3,677 tax returns, generating an economic impact of over 5 million. By offering free tax preparation services, we empower individuals and families to maximize their refunds and use those resources to improve their financial situations. - completed 59 mobile home tax reassessment appeals: we successfully advocated for 59 mobile homeowners, as part of our ongoing mobile home tax reassessment initiative. This effort has now pushed the total assessments to 1,111, resulting in a projected 9 million in savings for mobile home owners over a decade. These savings provide families with much-needed financial relief, stability, and security. -provided financial coaching and supportive services: nearly 286 individuals benefited from our financial stability center's personalized coaching, counseling, and other supportive services. By offering tailored assistance, we empower residents to achieve their financial goals, whether it's budgeting, saving for a home, or managing debt. These accomplishments reflect united way of chester county's unwavering commitment to improving the quality of life for our neighbors. We believe that by working together, we can overcome challenges and create sustainable, positive change. Our focus on collaboration, innovation, and accountability ensures that every dollar and effort invested makes a real, measurable difference, helping to build a more inclusive, prosperous chester county for all.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 63% for direct work, and 37% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 71
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75.6%; rating input score 76
  • Program expense ratio: 81.5%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: $10.98 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.9%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 7.4%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.62; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 17.5%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -7.1% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -5.8% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 75.6% of revenue deployed · 81.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 24 of 24 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $193K · 26 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 27 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 24 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 41/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.