United Way of Burlington County Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
210696817
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2011
Forms available
Form 990 2011
Location
Rancocas, NJ, USA
Phone
6092674500
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Federated Giving Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,455,462
Expenses
$4,590,380
Assets
$3,200,875
Liabilities
$2,412,951

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

36 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The United Way of Burlington County is a locally run volunteer organization dedicated to improving the quality of life for the people of our community.

What it reported doing in 2011

The United Way of Burlington County is a locally run volunteer organization dedicated to improving the quality of life for the people of our community. This is accomplished by collaborating with local government and supporting programs at local, nonprofit partner agencies that address three critical focus areas that are the building blocks of a strong community: Education, Income and Health. Education - This area seeks to help children and youth achieve their potential by supporting them with a safe, caring environment, mentors, positive development experiences, social interaction and appropriate learning opportunities.Income - This area seeks to promote financial stability and independence through continued support of job training, affordable housing, financial education and homlessness prevention.Health - This area focuses on improving people's health by providing basic needs such as food and temporary shelter, home health care, hospice, violence prevention and response and individual and family counseling. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *The United Way of Burlington County continues to be one of the most efficient not-for- profit organizations in the area. This is directly related to the involvement of hundreds of volunteers throughout the year and thousands during the fall fund drive that helps the United Way increase each donation with low overhead costs.The United Way of Burlington County was a founding member of the local Code Blue committee. Code Blue is a plan that helped to establish climatic thresholds for extreme cold weather situations in order for the unsheltered homeless population to be protected to prevent hypothermia, frostbite and other related injuries that could lead to death. The plan provides the guidelines for a Code Blue declaration to be instituted and allows for the sheltering of the homeless in designated churches. The official Code Blue season is generally from December to March. UWBCis the financial manager of state funding provided to the County Code Blue service providers.Our United Way is the managing agency for federal funding received in the County through FEMA's Emergency Food and Shelter Program. We convene the local board, consisting of mandated agency representatives and area providers, who review the funding requests and develop the spending plan. We are also responsible for all local board reporting.The Burlington County Housing for Families Preservation Program is administered by the Board of Social Services, in cooperation with the UWBC. The program's goal is to afford families the opportunity to maintain their permanent housing and not become homeless, forced to rely on motels or other arrangements as their means for housing. UWBC promotes, on an ongoing basis, two very valuable programs in our community: Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and 211. The benefits and availability of a tax credit or refund through the EITC has been promoted to more than 6,000 residents through posters, flyers and the distribution of information to agency providers.Information and presentations including wallet cards regarding 211 have been distributed to over 30,000 individuals. 211 is an easy to remember 3 digit number that can be dialed for up to date information when an individual is looking for a service or needs help with a problem.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 84.6%; rating input score 85; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 65.9%; rating input score 66; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.7; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.75; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.8%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -11.5% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 34 of 34 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $142K · 36 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 29 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2009 to 2011
  • Money network: 69 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 69 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 46/100.