UnityPoint Health - Trinity Rock Island
Legal name: Trinity Medical Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 362739299
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Rock Island, IL, USA
- Phone
- 3097792200
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $477,877,757
- Expenses
- $473,534,024
- Assets
- $482,130,656
- Liabilities
- $264,363,000
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
26 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SHAWN MORROW (BOARD MEMBER/MARKET PRESIDENT)
- DENNIS DUKE (PRESIDENT RYC)
- ROBERT ERICKSON TO 823 (FORMER PRESIDENT/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- KATHERINE MARCHIK TO 124 (SR VP FINANCE/CFO): $916,964 total reported compensation
- TOYOSI OLUTADE MD (MARKET CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER): $892,809 total reported compensation
- RHONDA SOWARDS MD (EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN): $750,598 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Improve the health of the people and communities we serve. Our Code of Conduct booklet summarizes the standards outlined in the code of conduct policy. Our code of conduct provides standards of conduct and sets expectations for workplace behaviors. It also protects and promotes organization-wide integrity and enhances our ability to achieve our mission and vision. Section Menu About UnityPoint Health. In addition, other federal laws such as 42 CFR Part 2 which governs the confidentiality of substance use disorder information, as well as state law, may provide added protections for certain types of health information. At UnityPoint Health, we have a compliance program that includes policies implementing patient privacy and security requirements mandated under all applicable federal and state law. We provide training to our team members on the importance of complying with these...
What it reported doing in 2024
Community benefit, including charity carecharity care and means-tested programs: trinity medical center provides charity care and other means-tested programs with the goal to improve the community's overall health and access to care. This includes health-care services regardless of the patient's insurance coverage or financial status. Charity care and partial to full financial assistance is provided to patients on a case-by-case basis. Charity care was made available at a value of $3,014,351 in 2024. Oftentimes, trinity medical center receives payments from payors or patients that are less than it charges for services. Trinity medical center participates in medicaid and other government-sponsored health-care programs. Trinity medical center's net cost of providing care for which it receives payment below its cost is $8,194,494 for 2024. Total charity care and means-tested programs reported value: $11,208,845.other benefits: trinity medical center provides several other benefits that assist the community. Programs may include, but are not limited to, community health improvement services and community benefit operations such as prevention and health screenings; continuing education for health professionals; subsidized health services; research; and cash and in-kind contributions to community groups. Trinity medical center collaborates with other hospitals, churches, schools, chambers of commerce and daycare centers to improve community health and expand access to health care. Trinity medical center has dedicated staff to assist community benefit efforts. Total other benefits reported value: $28,839,814.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 96% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 94% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 72
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 98.2%; rating input score 98
- Program expense ratio: 97.4%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 81.8%; rating input score 82; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.9%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.02; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.55; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 98.2% of revenue deployed · 97.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $461.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $917K · 26 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $36.9M reported
- Consistency: 38 of 39 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 18 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 82 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.