Trinity Credit Counseling Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 311410758
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025
- Location
- Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Phone
- 5137690621
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Financial Counseling
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $7,679,281
- Expenses
- $6,914,972
- Assets
- $11,604,072
- Liabilities
- $2,623,077
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GARY A VOSICK (PRESIDENT)
- JADE DURHAM (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- GARY A VOSICK (PRESIDENT): $329,388 total reported compensation
- JADE DURHAM (VICE PRESIDENT): $285,235 total reported compensation
- WC SHAD FRANCIS (DIRECTOR OF OUTREACH): $156,628 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Trinity is committed to addressing the underlying causes of debt and financial distress for individuals and families. As a credit counseling agency, we believe financial education provides a remedy for addressing debt, the misuse of credit, bankruptcy, and poor financial planning. Trinity's mission is to help those experiencing financial distress improve their financial situation through counseling and education.
What it reported doing in 2025
Trinity provides credit counseling, debt management, and debt counseling for individuals and families who are experiencing debt problems or need guidance to formulate a monthly budget. Being a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization, many of these services are offered at no cost to our clients. Those who inquire about our service are given access to a certified credit counselor. To start, counselors provide an explantion of all the services offered. Through conversation, counselors will facilitate a series of questions to obtain insight regarding the caller's overall situation. Once enough information is collected, counselors use their expertise to decide what options are available that can target and resolve the caller's specific needs. For those in need of financial counseling, the first step is the dree debt analysis. This critical step allows the counselor to review the client's income, expenses, and identify potential problem areas. Counselors give suggestions on ways in which the client can improve their budget and financial situation. Details pertaining to debts owed are also reviewed. Recommendations are explained about available options that would assist with repaying debts. The counselor will work to identify the root cause of the client's situation so that proper corrective action can take place. Counselors will provide follow up counseling at various intervals based on each individual's needs. Weekly, trinity receives as many as 450 inquiries via the telephone, internet, or in person. Annually, this amounts to more than 23,000 people who contact trinity seeking our assistance. All are given access to a certified credit counselor. Approximately 43% of these inquirers go on to complete an application. Of the applications received, about 42% are advised to enter into a dmp. The remaining 58% are offered alternative solutions such as working with creditors directly, bankruptcy, or an applicable referral to an outside resource for help pertaining to auto loans, mortgage loans, or student loan relief. Trinity's education and outreach efforts are intended to inform the community of personal financial management skills and techniques. Trinity's education and outreach efforts focus on several targeted audiences: youth and adult financial education, community colleges and workforce development and housing education. Education and outreach efforts are collaborative such as working with public schools, community organizations, governmental agencies, credit unions and private businesses. Trinity strives to build and sustain community partnerships to expand organizational capacity and serves the community through financial education presentations, workshops, or seminars. In 2025, 5,827 individuals were reached by trinity's education programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 95% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 66
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.9%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 91.1%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 40.2%; rating input score 40; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.68; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13.5%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78.9% of revenue deployed · 91.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $329K · 8 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 22 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 14 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 40/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.