Tri-county Memorial Hospital Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 390704510
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Whitehall, WI, USA
- Phone
- 7155384361
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $45,144,967
- Expenses
- $42,537,881
- Assets
- $75,180,360
- Liabilities
- $51,647,687
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SCOTT RATHGABER MD (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- SCOTT RATHGABER MD (CEO): $1,397,550 total reported compensation
- JOHN CEELEN (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $782,368 total reported compensation
- KIMBERLY BREIDENBACH (BOARD OF DIRECTORS, MD): $448,794 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Together, we inspire your best life by relentlessly caring, learning and innovating.
What it reported doing in 2024
Tri-county memorial hospital, inc. ("tri-county") provides inpatient, outpatient, and emergency health care services and other financial support through various programs that are designed, among other matters, to enhance the health of the community including the health of low income patients. The organization operates a critical access hospital and provides inpatient acute care and swing bed services, along with an emergency department, which is open twenty-four hours per day, and other outpatient services. Visiting specialists from an affiliated organization, gundersen clinic, ltd., perform outpatient gastroenterology, orthopedic, and ophthalmic surgical procedures at the facility as well. Tri-county also operates an assisted living facility, three rural health clinics, and an ambulance service. The critical access hospital had 852 inpatient acute days, 54 respite days, 3277 swing bed days, 660 surgical operations, and 8616 er visits in the period october 1 through september 30, 2025. Consistent with the mission of tri-county, care is provided to patients regardless of their ability to pay, including providing services to those persons who are either underinsured or cannot afford health insurance because of inadequate resources. Health care services to patients under government programs, such as medicaid hospital services, are also considered part of tri-county's benefit provided to the community, since a substantial portion of such services are reimbursed at amounts less than the costs of providing care. Patients who meet certain criteria for charity care, generally based on federal poverty guidelines, are provided care at a significantly reduced rate, determined based on qualifying criteria as defined in tri-county's charity care policy, and from applications completed by patients and their families. The amount of hospital and clinic charges foregone for services and supplies furnished under this policy during 2025 totaled $1,181,432. In addition, discounts to the medicaid program for hospital and clinic services amounted to $5,209,289. Benefits for serving the community also include unpaid costs of treating the elderly, health screenings, community education through seminars and classes, and other health-related services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 98% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 76
- Accountability: 58
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74%; rating input score 74
- Program expense ratio: 78.5%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 44.4%; rating input score 44; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.8%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.77; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.69; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.8%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.3% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74% of revenue deployed · 78.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $33.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.4M · 22 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $5.2M reported
- Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 31 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 44/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.